HI Aekold,
See this: http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/qdoc/
Debao
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Aekold Helbrass wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> Writing my very first project with QtQuick, and have first bunch of questions:
>
> 1. In documentation I see comment for every property. C++ part of Qt
> had
Hi All!
Writing my very first project with QtQuick, and have first bunch of questions:
1. In documentation I see comment for every property. C++ part of Qt
had /* */ for simple comment and /** */ for documentation comment, but
I can't find that kind of documentation comment for QML. Is there any?
On 21.04.12 11:23:19, Rick Stockton wrote:
> On 04/21/2012 05:53 AM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>
> > As a proof of concept, a naive "user settings aware" Qt implementation
> > could be
> >
> > - When initialising QApplication and
> > - When we detect running on KDE
> > - Dynamically link to "
On 21.04.12 14:53:13, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>
> Am 21.04.2012 um 13:04 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll
> :
>
> >> I assume KDE does not provide a way for applications to query those
> >> settings,
> >
> > Without any concrete knowledge of the KDE API: I can't imagine that there's
> > /no/ such
I'm used qt (4.6.3 open source / static complied ) on mac leopard for a
long time, and it works well.
recently, i upgraded to lion, then try to re-complie the 4.6.3 in static
again :
./configure -static -release -fast
cd src
make
but always get a strage error as title : kernel
On 04/21/2012 05:53 AM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> As a proof of concept, a naive "user settings aware" Qt implementation
> could be
>
> - When initialising QApplication and
> - When we detect running on KDE
> - Dynamically link to "KDE Core" library (if not already done so anyway)
> - For e
On sábado, 21 de abril de 2012 16.24.50, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> They have already been removed in Qt 5 though in commit
> 65bfc35429e845cf6b76d58107360a1360a654fc in qtdeclarative, so QML probably
> is LGPL-free in Qt 5.
Note: We're talking about the QtQml and QtQuick 2 libraries here, the ones
th
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> BRM wrote:
>
>> As pointed out, the main reason Qt Commercial customers buys the
>> commercial license is to not to have to worry about some of the LGPL
>> requirements - namely the ability to static link. Where I presently work
>> has a commercial license. We static link a
Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>
> Am 21.04.2012 um 13:04 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll
> :
>
>>> I assume KDE does not provide a way for applications to query those
>>> settings,
>>
>> Without any concrete knowledge of the KDE API: I can't imagine that
>> there's /no/ such public API which would expose
BRM wrote:
> As pointed out, the main reason Qt Commercial customers buys the
> commercial license is to not to have to worry about some of the LGPL
> requirements - namely the ability to static link. Where I presently work
> has a commercial license. We static link a lot of things. Could we
> dyn
21.04.2012, 16:53, "Till Oliver Knoll" :
> - When we detect running on KDE
> - Dynamically link to "KDE Core" library (if not already done so anyway)
This part is already done by KDE platform plugin for Qt, loaded automatically
when running KDE
--
Regards,
Konstantin
_
Am 21.04.2012 um 14:12 schrieb Thiago Macieira :
> On sábado, 21 de abril de 2012 12.09.32, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>> Hence adding a new constant for "fullscreen" would rather "complete an
>> existing feature" ...
>
> You're still adding a new symbol, which is not permitted.
... when it com
Am 21.04.2012 um 13:04 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll :
>> I assume KDE does not provide a way for applications to query those
>> settings,
>
> Without any concrete knowledge of the KDE API: I can't imagine that there's
> /no/ such public API which would expose *global* application settings.
Mayb
On sábado, 21 de abril de 2012 12.09.32, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Hence adding a new constant for "fullscreen" would rather "complete an
> existing feature" instead of "adding a new feature".
>
> And the whole world looks different all of a sudden, no?
You're still adding a new symbol, which is
Am 21.04.2012 um 12:16 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras :
>> ...
>> Last time I checked under KDE (the one coming with Kubuntu 10.10 - was
>> that 4.5?) - and that is a minute ago ;) - there /is/ a user settings
>> panel,
> It's the first time I see this.
No worries - me too ;)
(I usually never both
On 21/04/12 12:56, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
> Am 21.04.12 01:46, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
>> On 20/04/12 12:33, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I don't know whether this is already taken care of, but - where
>>> applicable - the standard keys should also consider user settings
>>> which migh
Am 21.04.12 02:23, schrieb 1+1=2:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Till Oliver Knoll
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hey, what about adding it to 4.8.x ...
> No, as Rock said, this is not a bugfix,
It's not exactly a new feature, either, one could argue. When you look
at the big picture you'll see that
Am 21.04.12 01:46, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
> On 20/04/12 12:33, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>> ...
>> I don't know whether this is already taken care of, but - where
>> applicable - the standard keys should also consider user settings
>> which might have changed these standard keys
>
> This is not
18 matches
Mail list logo
