Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 20.04.2012 um 00:13 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras : >> ... >> I meant that this is exactly an example that there seems to be no >> common agreement what the shortcut for "fullscreen" should be, even on >> the same platform. > > Every platform defines it in a clear manner. > ... > > KDE says "F1

Re: [Interest] QSqlRelationalDelegate combobox is not updated

2012-04-19 Thread Alex Malyushytskyy
I fixed problem manually calling select on the column relation model QSqlRelationalTableModel* model = model->select(); ... QSqlTableModel* childModel = model->relationModel ( TAC_street_id ); Q_CHECK_PTR( childModel ); childModel->select(); I am still not sure this is not a bug. I am

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 20/04/12 00:45, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: >> It described in the human interface >> guidelines of each platform. You can google them. > > As I wrote already, even Apple seems to be not sure what the standard > should be on OS X: several applications by Apple use /different/ > shortcuts! > > I

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 19.04.2012 um 23:45 schrieb Till Oliver Knoll : > > ... > > I was never questioning the need to handle platform specialities. > >> - >> In general, IMO this should be taken care of by the complex widgets >> themselves. > > Exactly what I said. Uh... sorry :) Due to Scott'

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 19.04.2012 um 22:38 schrieb "Scott Aron Bloom" : > ... > On 19/04/12 23:16, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: >> >> Am 19.04.2012 um 19:43 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >>> >>> In my apps, I provide "OK/Apply/Cancel" buttons in dialogs with >>> settings under KDE. When running in Gnome however, all se

[Interest] QSqlRelationalDelegate combobox is not updated

2012-04-19 Thread Alex Malyushytskyy
I found a problem which looks like a bug when trying to display data from database in QTableView using QSqlRelationalDelegate. Assume I have 2 tables: -streets -addresses Table Addresses has column which contains reference to ID in the streets. QSqlRelationalTableModel is used for both tables and

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
I respect that. That I don't want my code to be used in a non-open manner without getting paid is my personal decision, of course. On 19/04/12 23:59, BRM wrote: > Just FYI - > > FSF requires the signing of a CLA that gives them nearly the same authority > for any GNU projects. They could theor

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread BRM
Just FYI - FSF requires the signing of a CLA that gives them nearly the same authority for any GNU projects. They could theoretically change the license of all GNU GPL/LGPL projects they run to a 100% proprietary license without any recourse from the developers involved (they signed the CLA). H

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Scott Aron Bloom
-Original Message- From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Nikos Chantziaras Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 1:27 PM To: interest@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Interest] Contributor agreeme

Re: [Interest] QSqlDatabase::addDatabase ("QOCI")

2012-04-19 Thread Markus
Am 19.04.2012 14:42, schrieb salome...@terra.es: > When I run my application compiled with Visual Studio works without > problem, but when I run my application compiled with MinGW when it > gets to that point it stops working. What returns QSqlDatabase::drivers() when you use MinGW? Is there a

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 19/04/12 23:16, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: > > Am 19.04.2012 um 19:43 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >> >> In my apps, I provide "OK/Apply/Cancel" buttons in dialogs with >> settings under KDE. When running in Gnome however, all settings >> apply instantly when changes, and the dialog only has a "Clo

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
Am 19.04.2012 um 19:43 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras : > > In my apps, I provide "OK/Apply/Cancel" buttons in dialogs with settings > under KDE. When running in Gnome however, all settings apply instantly when > changes, and the dialog only has a "Close" button. Yes, that makes sense to me. Howe

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 19/04/12 11:44, Till Oliver Knoll wrote: > Am 18.04.2012 um 22:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > >> Qt already detects the environment, but it's all kept private. What I >> had in mind is exposing this to the user through QSysInfo when he needs >> to provide different behavior for Gnome, KDE, Xfc

Re: [Interest] Qt5 & QX11EmbedContainer?

2012-04-19 Thread R. Reucher
On Thursday 19 April 2012 14:01:57 Thiago Macieira wrote: > The development list is right next to this one. It's development@qt- > project.org. Make sure you subscribe so you receive the replies. > > The code is what you already have :-) Yep, understood :)! I just meant if anyone has already start

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
19.04.2012, 05:22, "Lincoln Ramsay" : > Even if Nokia abandons Qt, it will not become a "free software" project > because the Free Qt foundation will release the code under the BSD license. BSDL is FSF-approved free software license. -- Regards, Konstantin _

[Interest] QSqlDatabase::addDatabase ("QOCI")

2012-04-19 Thread salome...@terra.es
Hello, Why don´t work QSqlDatabase::addDatabase ("QOCI") in MinGW 64-bit and if it works in Visual Studio 2008 to 64-bit?. When I run my application compiled with Visual Studio works without problem, but when I run my application compiled with MinGW when it gets to that point it stops working

Re: [Interest] Qt5 & QX11EmbedContainer?

2012-04-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 18 de abril de 2012 21.22.49, R. Reucher wrote: > On Wednesday 18 April 2012 20:50:01 Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > > > Asked differently... is there a general / platform-independent > > > replacement for it? THAT would be cool :)! > > > > There's no platform independent replacement

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 18 de abril de 2012 22.08.57, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > 3. Everybody here agrees that Qt as in qt-project.org and Qt as in Qt > > Commercial need to be the same, otherwise it's a mess. This is why the > > Qt Project has that contribution agreement, and this is why Digia > > (mai

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 19 de abril de 2012 11.22.57, Lincoln Ramsay wrote: > Even if Nokia abandons Qt, it will not become a "free software" project > because the Free Qt foundation will release the code under the BSD license. Actually, the Free Qt Foundation receives the code under the BSD license. Th

Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
2012/4/19 Nikos Chantziaras : > That is totally irrelevant to me.  If closing code doesn't happen in > practice, then the agreement has no reason to secure that possibility. IANAL, but let's just assume that there is a very good reason for the owner of the software (Nokia/Digia) to keep the right

[Interest] Fwd: Contributor agreement rundown

2012-04-19 Thread Till Oliver Knoll
... and to the proper recipient again... Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail: > Von: Till Oliver Knoll > Datum: 19. April 2012 10:44:51 MESZ > An: Nikos Chantziaras > Betreff: Re: [Interest] Contributor agreement rundown > > > > Am 18.04.2012 um 22:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras : > >> Qt alr