First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the
only solutions that could fit our needs.
Unfortunately I really don't know cyrus and I would like to have some of
its assets.
Here are the properties of the versus ta
Alain Spineux a écrit :
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the only
solutions that could fit our needs.
Unfortunately I really don't know c
Wesley Craig a écrit :
On 11 Aug 2008, at 08:57, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
what is in use now ?
Cyrus
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Are you having a problem with Cyrus? Migrating from any server to any
other is likely to be challenging (to say the least), so you ought to
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
The real question is because we have only 2 options :
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
to have a managed mail store. Cyrus is the only Open Source IMAP/POP
server I know of with
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 12:53 +0200, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
The real question is because we have only 2 options :
Why should I choose Cyrus instead of dovecot ?
Features like delayed expunge, message expiration, etc... that allow you
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok thanks ! A good point on the cyrus side !
What about the performance ?
Depends on which size your scenario will be.
Does my next configuration will run correctly ? Which hardware should I
buy for this ac
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thanks you for your participation but not for the way you do it because
if you had read my second mail on this topic you wouldn't have to ask
your crystal sphere to wonder what is my configuration !!
I did mi
Tornoci Laszlo a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
Alain Spineux a écrit :
2008/8/11 Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
First of all : forgive me for my poor English
Hello all,
I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the
only
solutions that could fi
kbajwa a écrit :
Hello:
I think you are missing a point which is most important, i.e., what type of
support Cyrus vs Dovecot offers. In my experience:
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
My personal experience.
Kirt
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer at Cyrus mailing list.
I'
Pascal Gienger a écrit :
Mathieu Kretchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kbajwa a écrit :
Cyrus = 0
Dovecot= 100
I guess you've right but I can't post this answer at Cyrus mailing list.
I'm just trying to have my own opinion of imap server and I already hav
Ian G Batten a écrit :
>> the mail, the indices, and the mailboxes.db. Each can be on
>> separate storage with optimal price vs performance characteristics
>> for the proposed load.
>
>
> We have 48000 mailboxes on behalf of 2000 users, with typically 1700
> imapd processes during the day and ~1
imaptest ?
http://www.imapwiki.org/ImapTest
faris a écrit :
> Dear All,
>
> Please tell me which is the best way to benchmark/loadtest 200K
> useraccounts to see the maximum performance ?
> Regards,
> Faris
>
>
>
>
>
Hello,
Does anyone have a cyrus.wld or a special configuration in order to
bench imap with Mstone ? Because the result of mstone doesn't fit
exactly my needs !
Thanks in advance.
begin:vcard
fn:Mathieu Kretchner
n:Kretchner;Mathieu
org:INRIA;Syslog
adr;dom:;;2004 route des lucioles - BP93;Sophia
Hello,
I would like to allow connection to sieved server with PLAIN mechanism.
But my configuration seems to already have this. What do I miss ?
Cyrus is 2.2.12
here is my imapd.conf :
configdirectory: /data/imap
partition-default: /data/imap/spool
servername: imap-sop.inria.fr
admins: cyrus
has
;
>
> allowplaintext: no
> sasl_minimum_layer: 128
>
> tls_cert_file:
> tls_key_file:
> tls_ca_file:
> tls_cipher_list: !ADH:MEDIUM:HIGH
>
> This assumes that your sieve client supports TLS.
>
> Quoting Raphael Jaffey :
>
>> sieve_allowplaintext: ye
IN*
Michael Menge wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Mathieu Kretchner :
>
>> Ok thank you for your help,
>>
>> I've tried the allowplaintext: yes but the proxy sieve server I use is
>> still complaining !
>>
>> I don't know why? I've done a tcp/ip
Ho sorry,
I've done some others tests with sivtest and it's possible to connect
with PLAIN.
Michael Menge wrote:
>
> Quoting Mathieu Kretchner :
>
>> It seems like I've no plain text auth capability !!
>>
>
> Depending on you distribution plain au
Hello,
Is it possible to restore seen file even if the mailbox has changed ?
If yes how ?
thanks
begin:vcard
fn:Mathieu Kretchner
n:Kretchner;Mathieu
org:INRIA;Syslog
adr;dom:;;2004 route des lucioles - BP93;Sophia Antipolis;;06902 CEDEX
email;internet:mathieu.kretch...@sophia.inria.fr
tel;work:
No answer !
So could I say that there is no possibility to restore an old seen file
for an user ?
thanks for your help
Mathieu Kretchner a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to restore seen file even if the mailbox has changed ?
>
> If yes how ?
>
> thanks
>
> -
So thank you all and specially John Widera for your help,
Just a simple replace of the new seen file by an old one allowed me to
restore the seen flag on thousand mails.
Andreas Winkelmann a écrit :
> Am Mittwoch 15 April 2009 14:56:32 schrieb Mathieu Kretchner:
>
>
>> No an
;>> you'd maintain the seen state of new files too.
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> John
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok thank you for the help, I'll try t
21 matches
Mail list logo
