On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote:
> Good luck building it! ;) This code needs work. When I find some time
> I'll try to work on it...
>
> -Igor
I notice the imapd.conf man page mentions the 'memberOf' attribute.
Unless I'm mistaken, that's a bit of a controversial thing, huh?
That is, wh
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Will Prater wrote:
> How is the stability on this release? I have been re-vamping one of my
> production machines and I wanted to make use of the virtual support
> with fully qualified domain logins. How are you guys liking this!!
At least based on the way things seem to be g
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Any perceivable difference in performance? I was considering making the
> Xref stuff enabled by a config option, since not all clients need it,
> but if it doesn't slow things down too much, I won't bother.
>
>
On this box? My test box is a scruffy ol
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Until I add POST support, you could set a news2mail annotation on the
Hmm... grepping the source this would just be an email address, no?
Amos
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
> > Until I add POST support, you could set a news2mail annotation on the
>
> Hmm... grepping the source this would just be an email address, no?
>
I keep this up and nobody will ever answer any of my posts.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> >>Until I add POST support, you could set a news2mail annotation on the
> > Hmm... grepping the source this would just be an email address, no?
> Yes, and email address (or alias whic
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Joakim Ryden wrote:
> Jason Williams wrote:
> [...]
> > Then in my master.cf
> >
> > # Cyrus 2.1.5
> > cyrus unix - n n - - pipe
> > user=cyrus argv=/usr/local/cyrus/bin/deliver -r ${sender} -m
> > ${extension} ${user}
> >
> > So it envokes
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> The 3 vendor-specific annotations used by Cyrus are all documented in
> the appropriate locations:
>
> squat: squatter(8)
> expire: cyr_expire(8), install-netnews.html
> news2mail: install-netnews.html
What about these?
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> we've got Cyrus 2.1.16 running on Red Hat AS 2.1 with singleinstancestore
> and it's working well. A common case is that mails will have up to 5
> recipients:
>
> -rw---5 cyrusmail 3754 Jan 13 11:13
> /var/spool/imap/S/user/a0620
Hmmm... I guess these issues are still present with DB-4.2.52:
imaps[26503]: [ID 729713 local6.error] DBERROR: opening /po/var/imap/tls_sessions.db:
cyrusdb error
imaps[26828]: [ID 729713 local6.error] DBERROR: opening /po/var/imap/tls_sessions.db:
Not enough space
imaps[26828]: [ID 729713 lo
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Igor Brezac wrote:
> Hmm. You can clear this up by running db_recover from the /po/var/imap/db
> directory. What does db_stat -c say before you run db_recover? Do
> tls_prune|cyr_expire|ctl_cyrusdb -c run properly on your system?
>
> Also apply http://www.sleepycat.com/upda
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Igor Brezac wrote:
> How many clients did you have connected at that time?
At 01/13/04 23:30:00, looks like there were 465 cyrus processes.
Looking a bit more closely lately, I notice a couple of these pop up:
Jan 15 06:41:07 area51 imaps[4242]: Fatal error: tls_start_serve
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Nils Vogels wrote:
> When I try to set the news2mail annotation to my normal email address, I
> can verify the Return-Path header is indeed empty (Return-Path: <>)
>
> AFAIK, the use of <> is reserved for the popular Mailer-Daemon ;)
>
> Would it be an idea for Cyrus to use ei
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Nils Vogels wrote:
> > Why not just run squatter from master ?
> >
> > This works deliciously over here:
> >
> > EVENTS {
> >...
> > # Let's squat em
> > squat_usercmd="squatter -r -s user" period=1440
> >...
> > }
>
> That indexes all user
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Tim Pushor wrote:
> I am assuming by the lack of response that no-one really cares (at least
> at this point) about LDAP group based authorization.
Oh, I wouldn't go that far. I just think folks haven't gotten too
deep into it yet. If you search the archive you'll see it wa
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
> > Nils Vogels wrote:
> > > Why not just run squatter from master ?
> > >
> > > This works deliciously over here:
> > >
> > > EVENTS {
> > >...
> > > # Let's squat em
> > > squat_usercmd="squatter
I've been tinkering a little with a Java client, and just happened to
notice something I haven't noticed before:
. namespace
* NAMESPACE (("" ".")) (("Other_Users." ".")) (("Shared_Folders." "."))
. OK Completed
. list "" Other_Users
* LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "." "Other_Users"
. OK Completed
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I've been tinkering a little with a Java client, and just happened to
> > notice something I haven't noticed before:
> >
> > . namespace
> > * NAMESPACE (("" ".")) (("Other_Users." ".")) (("Shared_Folders." "."))
> > . OK C
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Jason Williams wrote:
>
> > Morning everyone,
> >
> > I've been working on implementing Bulletin Boards over here for our
> > company which will allow our users to be able to "share" a folder and
> > post/move messages into the folder for other users to
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Paul Bender wrote:
> By the way, I think that Garbage is beyond version 2.2.3. Version 2.0
> came out around 1998, and they have had at least one major release since
> then. ;-)
Oh, that's funny.
--
Amos
Any thought to having a << days="0,3" >> parameter to events in
cyrus.conf? I'm thinking it might be better to not have squatter
kick off when various VxFS filesystem maintenance is scheduled
--
Amos
Just out of curiosity, is there any reason why newspostuser results
in the adding of the To header instead of the Reply-To header?
--
Amos
---
Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I *believe* the logic that Larry and I worked out was that there might
> already be a Reply-To header (if a message was sent to a person and CC'd
> to a newsgroup for instance), so we thought it would be safer to just
> create or add to any existing To he
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I just committed this change to CVS. It seems to work just fine with
> Mozilla, Outlook and Pine.
>
> It also gave me the opportunity to cleanup the handling of netnews
> specific headers (Path, Xref) and to actually append the post addresses
> to the Re
On Tue, 11 Feb 2004, Alberto Tablado wrote:
> I think that is the key. Both Sendmail and Exim remember the AUTH=
> keyword issued by an authenticated MUA or MTA and pass along to the MDA
> (Cyrus) in the LMTP conversation. Postfix doesn't do this.
Correct, as evident in recent thread:
http://gro
Well, a colleague here reported spurious disconnects when attempting
to check his mail via Outlook Express. I noticed that a number of
his telemetry logs ended with:
03ZJ OK Completed (0.000 sec)
<1076565897<03ZK IDLE
>1076565897>+ idling
>1076565897>* BYE Connection reset by peer
Yeah, I know t
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Any article which gets posted to Cyrus nntpd will have the post address
> added to the Reply-To header, and this address will be present in the
> article when it is transferred to the outside news peer.
I thought I raised this concern, but it may have j
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I've actually been looking for more info on this type of thing, and here
> is what I found:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
>
> I can strip the address before transferring the article via NNTP, but
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> > If the message is inserted directly into this folder via just lmtp,
> > then the Reply-To (Newsgroups, etc.) header won't be added anyway
>
> True, but if the client replies to more than just the Reply-To, then the
> post address will get exposed
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Cesar Lagarrigue wrote:
> well, i put into production my server for 450 users... and have a lot of
> troubles with the clients outlook express and other few problems with the
> server.
Not too long ago we experienced some issues with Outlook users as
well. I made the followin
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Luca Manganelli wrote:
> Mar 8 18:57:19 ksmail-test perl: No worthy mechs found
Totally absurd I know, and I'm sorry that this doesn't help your
situation at all, but whenever I see this message, I can't help but
to think of Wayne's World. Yeah, pretty sad. It's a Monday.
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Luca Olivetti wrote:
> Sure, upgrade to mozilla 1.6 or thunderbird 0.5. They use "status" to
> check for new mail instead of downloading all the headers, and perform
> bayesian filtering only when you select a mailfolder. As a result I
> didn't see the problem with moz1.6/thun
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Stephen Grier wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:09, Ken Murchison wrote:
> > The biggest issue with sieve opn shared folders is how to use them. Are
> > they only executed when mail is delivered via LMTP, or are they executed
> > any time a message is inserted into the mailbo
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 02:28, Rob Siemborski wrote:
>
> > It also opens a world of possibility for new bugs. There definately isn't
> > a consensus on what the desireable behavior here is.
>
> User-created sieve loops strike me as one "fun" possibility to
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Luca Manganelli wrote:
> NO SPAM, DAMN IT!
What? You don't like spam with your eggs?
--
Amos
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, ADNET Ghislain wrote:
> My problem is that the client (i tried mozilla, netscape, thunderbird,
> outlook2003, evolution...) that is working perfectly at login but it
> hang on every imap access after some time. The mail client is just
> standing there and after some time for
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Carl P. Corliss wrote:
> Better yet, now that cyrus supports exporting shared folders via nntp,
> why not set up the complete cyrus archive (the shared folder on cmu.edu)
> as nntp newsgroups using cyrus 2.2.x?
If it's NNTP access you're after, why not use http://gmane.org/ ?
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
> Would it really have any serious advantage over forwarding the false
> negatives/positives to an email address for processing?
At this point I would say "yes". It's been hell trying to get folks
to forward the spam with the headers intact. Seems like ev
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
> I'm looking at setting up a DSPAM + Postfix + Cyrus solution here as
> well. I have to wonder about the advantages of setting up a shared spam
> folder for the system though.
Oh, not that it really matters, but we're using Postfix + amavisd-new
to call
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Andreas wrote:
> Is it useful? Does it use too much resources? Is it not used that much,
> and as such not well tested?
Haven't really noticed it taking up too much resources myself.
In terms of it being useful, rather informal trial and error
experimentation here seemed to
What about the following? I was thinking it might be nice if ipurge
had a -s option for skipping "special" messages. That is, if you
flag certain messages as special[*], then run ipurge -s on that
folder, these flagged messages would not be deleted even if they
otherwise matched the criteria for
--On Friday, November 8, 2002 7:49 PM -0500 Peter Krotkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Prior to a code fix to address the problems you observed, do you think it
| would be unreasonable to configure master so that imaps is not offered?
| We could revert to running stunnel for ssl support and then
--On Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:46 PM -0500 Ken Murchison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| You should use the SASL library to to the authentication so you can
| handle any available mechanism. The imtest.c program that comes with
| Cyrus is a good example of a SASL client - it handles SSL/TLS and
I guess slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if any folks on here are
using SpamAssassin, and if so, what sort of Sieve scripts you're using on
such tagged mail. I know that recent releases of Sieve have a numeric
comparator. Are you using that somehow, or just a simple match on the
"X-Spa
--On Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:49 PM -0800 Bill Wester
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| So with Cyrus, how did you get spamassassin to run? That is the problem
| im having is there is not a tight well done integration between
| sendmail/postfix -> spamassassin -> cyrus ->sieve -> spam happiness
--On Monday, November 25, 2002 4:36 PM +0100 Noll Janos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I think that's a very good idea, but we found that MySQL is much faster
| than Postgres, when there are no complex queries (this is the case here),
| so it might be a better idea to use MySQL.
Seems kinda ironi
--On Friday, December 6, 2002 3:27 PM +0100 Jure Pecar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I'm sure some of you use vxfs on solaris for cyrus mail spool ... What are
| your expiriences? Tunning tips? Maybe any vxfs on linux expiriences out
| there?
Works fine for us. Tis nice not having to worry about
2.1.11, with skiplist for mboxlist.db (I believe now the default).
--On Friday, December 6, 2002 4:49 PM +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hello,
|
| For a production mail server, which version of Cyrus IMAPD should I use ?
| Version 2.0.17 or version 2.1.11 ? And what are the differences really
|
--On Thursday, December 5, 2002 11:38 PM +0100 Christoph Burger-Scheidlin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Dec 5 23:03:25 Hades postfix/lmtp[16388]: 04316100F:
| to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=public/lmtp[public/lmtp],
| delay=21490, status=deferred (host public/lmtp[public/lmtp] said: 451
| 4.3.0 Sy
--On Sunday, December 8, 2002 2:57 AM +0100 Christian Schulte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
| Thanks a lot! After cvs update delivery now works! Great
| If I only would know how to use the gdb to step through sourcecode I
| could have provided yo
--On Friday, December 13, 2002 10:48 AM +1100 Rob Mueller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Yes. I think it's better to at least startup with a reduced DB, then fail
| to start at all.
Which means mail to those poor soles that got dropped from the db will
start bouncing horribly, right? If so, thes
--On Tuesday, December 17, 2002 4:24 PM -0800 Jonathan Marsden
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| So the question becomes: what, if anything can non-CMU people do that
| would help cause a release of 2.2 (or 2.1 with virtdomains in it??) to
| happen sooner rather than later?
Just a guess... send Ken s
If you watch the protocols, one difference should become apparent.
With SMTP, after the `.' concluding the `DATA' command, you'll only
get one response, no matter how many recipients were listed for that
message. However, with LMTP, you get a response for each recipient,
in the order that the rec
Yeah, I recollect something like this. Since I was concentrating on
other things at the moment, I forced my way through this issue as
follows:
LIBS="-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -R/usr/local/ssl/lib"
SASL_LIB="$LIBS -lsasl"
./configure
gmake SASL_LIB="$SASL_LIB"
g
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, Yom, Francis wrote:
> Postfix Beta 19991231 Patchlevel 8 - which came with 7.2
[...]
> Whenever I do the imtest. I also know Postfix can't deliver due to
> some lmtp failer - can't connect.
As for the Postfix part, you'll need to get a much more recent
snapshot than that.
55 matches
Mail list logo
