Re: POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?

2011-04-26 Thread Joost Roeleveld
On Saturday 23 April 2011 01:07:00 Bron Gondwana wrote: > The question came up from the following bug report: > > http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 > > Where there were spool files on disk, but no meta data left. > Reconstruct gave no information about the files on disk

Re: POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?

2011-04-26 Thread Simon Matter
> On Saturday 23 April 2011 01:07:00 Bron Gondwana wrote: >> The question came up from the following bug report: >> >> http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 >> >> Where there were spool files on disk, but no meta data left. >> Reconstruct gave no information about the files o

Re: POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?

2011-04-26 Thread Øyvind Kolbu
On 2011-04-23 at 10:34, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > Bron Gondwana wrote: > > 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require > >cyrus.header. > > > > This one has my preference. Mine as well. -- Øyvind Kolbu Postmaster Universitetet i Oslo pgppS7kNclXEU.pgp Descr

Re: POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?

2011-04-26 Thread Patrick Boutilier
On 04/26/2011 06:52 AM, Øyvind Kolbu wrote: > On 2011-04-23 at 10:34, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: >> Bron Gondwana wrote: >>> 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require >>> cyrus.header. >>> >> >> This one has my preference. > > Mine as well. Everybody seems to lik

Re: POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?

2011-04-26 Thread Øyvind Kolbu
On 2011-04-26 at 07:07, Patrick Boutilier wrote: > Everybody seems to like 3. But if you only have an empty directory with > no message files or something that resembles a cyrus file what is the > point of creating an empty folder? :-) I don't see why we'd suddenly get a spurious empty directory

DECISION: what reconstruct -f should do

2011-04-26 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: > 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require >cyrus.header. > > 4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one cyrus.* file >OR at least one message file in the directory before >creating the mailbox. (so

Re: DECISION: what reconstruct -f should do

2011-04-26 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require >>cyrus.header. >> >> 4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one cyrus.* file >>OR at least one message file in the

Re: DECISION: what reconstruct -f should do

2011-04-26 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang" wrote: > I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing > INBOX.sub.folder1 > and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism > > if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user didn't want it, could they > remove > it without af

Re: DECISION: what reconstruct -f should do

2011-04-26 Thread David Lang
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang" > wrote: >> I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing >> INBOX.sub.folder1 >> and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism >> >> if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user di

Re: DECISION: what reconstruct -f should do

2011-04-26 Thread Michael D. Sofka
Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang" > wrote: >> I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing >> INBOX.sub.folder1 >> and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism >> >> if you were to create INBOX.sub and the user didn't want it, could th

Re: DECISION: what reconstruct -f should do

2011-04-26 Thread OBATA Akio
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:20:51 +0900, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang" > wrote: >> I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing >> INBOX.sub.folder1 >> and INBOX.sub.folder2 as an organizational mechanism >> >> if you were to create INBOX.sub

Re: DECISION: what reconstruct -f should do

2011-04-26 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:31:40AM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:20:51 +0900, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > >On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:19 -0700, "David Lang" > > wrote: > >>I can easily see someone wanting to have INBOX.sub containing > >>INBOX.sub.folder1 > >>and INBOX.sub.folder2

Re: DECISION: what reconstruct -f should do

2011-04-26 Thread Joost Roeleveld
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 10:19:36 David Lang wrote: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: > >> 3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require > >> > >>cyrus.header. > >> > >> 4) like (3) - but check that there'