Hi
i am trying to get the cyris nntp server to work, but i find the
documentation rather lacking.
I have read this one
http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/imapd/install-netnews.html
and thats about all i could find about the cyrus nntp server.
I have set it up and have it running, and i can c
Simon Matter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:42:02 +0100
>>> Tomas Janousek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> tjanouse> Looks correct. (will not terminate if it reaches NGROUPS, don't
>> know if that
>> tjanouse> can happen though)
>>
>> Oops, it never happen.
>> It is intended to be
Time to do things the better way neither (for me at least)!
Thanks a lot
Pietro
Pietro Toschi
Actalis S.p.A. Gruppo AlmavivA
Via Luigi Rizzo, 20
00136 Roma
www.actalis.it
Office: 06-39933169
Mobile: 335-7244764
Fax: 06-39935348
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Alain Spineux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
> Hi,
>
>> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:42:02 +0100
>> Tomas Janousek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> tjanouse> Looks correct. (will not terminate if it reaches NGROUPS, don't
> know if that
> tjanouse> can happen though)
>
> Oops, it never happen.
> It is intended to be safe-keeping for avoiding e
Hi
A user having administrative right on another mailbox can remove all
rights (including implicite ones) to the owner's mailbox.
I don't things is an expected feature!
Right ?
A buggy(*) test try to prevent to owner to remove its own right but
don't apply for other non admin user !
*buggy beca
I thing I found the use for loginrealms option.
I works like a filter.
Imagine you have an authentication infrastructure for multiple
domains: example.com, example.net .
I could be running on ldap, kerberos,
Then you have an imap server that manage users only for domain example.com.
If
Hi I wrote a patch for this
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2998
On Oct 1, 2007 11:29 AM, Toschi Pietro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have a cyrus 2.3.9 test server with two virtual domains: aa.it and bb.it.
> Having "virtualdomains: yes", I've experimented
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:39:45AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
> That's friggin' great! We can't exactly force people to have a
> particular version of glibc just to run Cyrus 2.3.10. Either we need to
> come up with something that will run on all systems, or I'll be inclined
> to remove the
On Nov 8, 2007 4:56 PM, Dan White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael D. Sofka wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:32:52 pm Rob Mueller wrote:
> >> 4. Lots of other little things
> >>
> >> a) putting the proc dir on tmpfs is a good idea
> >> b) make sure you have the right filesystem (on lin
To close the loop since I started this thread:
We still haven't finished up the contract to get Sun out here to
get to the REAL bottom of the problem.
However observationally we find that under high email usage that
above 10K users on a Cyrus instance things get really bad. Like last
week we ha
Michael D. Sofka wrote:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:32:52 pm Rob Mueller wrote:
>> 4. Lots of other little things
>>
>> a) putting the proc dir on tmpfs is a good idea
>> b) make sure you have the right filesystem (on linux, reiserfs is much
>> better than ext3 even with ext3s dir hashing) and
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:39:45AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>> That's friggin' great! We can't exactly force people to have a
>> particular version of glibc just to run Cyrus 2.3.10. Either we need to
>> come up with something that will run on all systems, or I'll be inclined
>> to remove
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:18:04AM -0800, Vincent Fox wrote:
> Our latest line of investigation goes back to the Fastmail suggestion,
> simply
> have multiple Cyrus binary instances on a system. Each running it's own
> config and with it's own ZFS filesystems out of the pool to use.
> Since we ca
Gary Mills wrote:
> We have a moderate-sized Cyrus system for 30,000 students and 3000
> employees. ... I know that CMU and other universities want
> to maintain their own e-mail systems. What's the justification in
> these cases?
>
>
>From a security perspective, you maintain control and priv
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
>
>> It may not be worth for you to worry about it but it is worth for me and
>> maybe also for Ken. People using my RPMs expect things to work. And
>> people
>> do use it on affected systems and they fill my mailbox or the list with
>
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
>
>> It may not be worth for you to worry about it but it is worth for me and
>> maybe also for Ken. People using my RPMs expect things to work. And
>> people
>> do use it on affected systems and they fill my mailbox or the list with
>
On Thursday 08 November 2007 10:56:54 am Dan White wrote:
> Michael D. Sofka wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 October 2007 07:32:52 pm Rob Mueller wrote:
> >> 4. Lots of other little things
> >>
> >> a) putting the proc dir on tmpfs is a good idea
> >> b) make sure you have the right filesystem (on linux,
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:18:04AM -0800, Vincent Fox wrote:
>
>> Our latest line of investigation goes back to the Fastmail suggestion,
>> simply
>> have multiple Cyrus binary instances on a system. Each running it's own
>> config and with it's own ZFS filesystems out o
Akshay Kumar wrote:
> --On Wednesday, April 18, 2007 10:40:50 +0200 Andrzej Adam Filip
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would like to announce new version of RTCyrus recipes for Sendmail and
>> Cyrus IMAP integration.
>>
>> RTCyrus3 has been designed for easy integration of sendmail with virtua
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
> It may not be worth for you to worry about it but it is worth for me and
> maybe also for Ken. People using my RPMs expect things to work. And people
> do use it on affected systems and they fill my mailbox or the list with
> complain
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with an old cyrus 1.5 installation on a debian
sarge box.
Cyrus does not reject mail for users with an over_quota mailbox. So my
postfix queue runs full.
I know, that there is lmtp_overquota_perm_failure for cyrus 2. Is there
any equivalent for cyrus 1.5, or another
> However observationally we find that under high email usage that
> above 10K users on a Cyrus instance things get really bad. Like last
> week we had a T2000 at about 10,500 users and loads of 5+ and it
> was bogging down. We moved 1K users off bringing it down to
> 9,500 and loads dropped to
We have a moderate-sized Cyrus system for 30,000 students and 3000
employees. It's a critical service in the sense that thousands of
people depend on it. It has excellent performance, lots of capacity,
and plans for expansion. I'm the only one familiar enough with Cyrus
and sendmail to maintain
Gary Mills wrote:
> How many
> and what sort of people does it take to maintain a system such as
> this? I need a good argument for hiring a replacement for me.
>
>
At a minimum you want 1 qualified person and someone cross-trained
as a backup, so that person can reasonably enough have vacatio
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Gary Mills wrote:
> We have a moderate-sized Cyrus system for 30,000 students and 3000
> employees. It's a critical service in the sense that thousands of
> people depend on it. It has excellent performance, lots of capacity,
> and plans for expansion. I'm the only one famil
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Also virtual interfaces means you can move an instance without having
> to tell anyone else about it (but it sounds like you're going with an
> "all eggs in one basket" approach anyway)
>
>
No, not "all eggs in one basket", but better usage of resources.
It seems silly
Everytime I send email to the list now I get a bounce from "Gateway".
Could some kindly admin please remove the account causing this bounce?
Header snippet:
>Received: from mail.goldengatelanguage.com ([4.79.216.102])
> by mx12.ucdavis.edu (8.13.7/8.13.1/it-defang-5.4.0) with ESMTP id
lA92U7
Vincent Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our working hypothesis is that CYRUS is what is choking up at a certain
> activity level due to bottlenecks with simultaneous access to some shared
> resource for each instance.
Did you do a
lockstat -Pk sleep 30
(with "-x destructive" when it complains
28 matches
Mail list logo
