Re: Saslauthd and 2 authentication mechanism

2005-07-01 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Andrew Morgan schreef: > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Paul van der Vlis wrote: > >> Igor Brezac schreef: >> >>> >>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Paul van der Vlis wrote: >>> Hello, I want to use 2 authentication mechanisms with Saslauthd. When the first one gives "no", it should try th

cyrus quota beavior

2005-07-01 Thread Christian Anton
Hi list, i use web-cyradm in the actual cvs version and have the following problem with cyrus and its quotas: I use the option: lmtp_over_quota_perm_failure: 1 in my imapd.conf to ensure that when the mailbox's quota is over, the mail is rejected to the sender. But it seems that cyrus acceps a

Simple script to add a mailbox

2005-07-01 Thread Paul van der Vlis
Hello, I've added a simple script to add a mailbox to the wiki: http://acs-wiki.andrew.cmu.edu/twiki/bin/view/Cyrus/ImapCreate2 It's based on Expect. With regards, Paul van der Vlis. --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/I

Re: cyrus quota beavior

2005-07-01 Thread Ken Murchison
Christian Anton wrote: Hi list, i use web-cyradm in the actual cvs version and have the following problem with cyrus and its quotas: I use the option: lmtp_over_quota_perm_failure: 1 in my imapd.conf to ensure that when the mailbox's quota is over, the mail is rejected to the sender. But

Re: Saslauthd and 2 authentication mechanism

2005-07-01 Thread Igor Brezac
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Andrew Morgan schreef: On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Igor Brezac schreef: On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, I want to use 2 authentication mechanisms with Saslauthd. When the first one gives "no", it shoul

Re: Saslauthd and 2 authentication mechanism

2005-07-01 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Igor Brezac wrote: Saslauthd with pam seems to be the more-stable and flexable alternative. It is more flexible, but not more stable (see archives), performance is suspect as well. Is it possible in pam to use more then one module? Yes. Here is what my /etc/pam.d/

moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread Christian Anton
Hi everybody again, As Ken helped me with my feature request for the quota behavior of cyrus-imapd i now have one more question i don't understand. If i have a Mailbox with 5MB quota, there is 4.9MB in use and i want to move one message with 1 MB from one folder to another, cyrus gives me an er

Re: moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread Dave McMurtrie
Christian Anton wrote: > Hi everybody again, > > As Ken helped me with my feature request for the quota behavior of > cyrus-imapd > i now have one more question i don't understand. > > If i have a Mailbox with 5MB quota, there is 4.9MB in use and i want to move > one message with 1 MB from one

Re: moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread Chris Hilts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > If i have a Mailbox with 5MB quota, there is 4.9MB in use and i want to > move one message with 1 MB from one folder to another, cyrus gives me an > error message that says i'm "over quota". Why does moving a message need > space in the mailbox, i do

Re: moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread John Madden
> Because IMAP doesn't provide a "move" operation for messages. Your > client is probably first doing an append of the message to the > destination folder (which is what's putting it over quota) then storing > the delete flag of the original message and expunging. I'm sure we've all had problems

unable to receive emails?

2005-07-01 Thread Matt Singerman
Hello all, I am setting up a new machine running Fedora Core 3 and the Cyrus packages that came with it. I followed the instructions for using this setup found here: http://nakedape.cc/info/Cyrus-IMAP-HOWTO/quickstart-fedora.html I am able to successfully log onto the IMAP server; however, I am

Re: cyrus quota beavior

2005-07-01 Thread Jure Pecar
On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 09:37:40 -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christian Anton wrote: > > > The problem: It is not anymore possible to delete this mail because most > > of my users use IMAP or squirrelmail and when they "delete" a message > > it ist moved to "Trash"-Folder. Movin

Re: moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread Dave McMurtrie
John Madden wrote: >>Because IMAP doesn't provide a "move" operation for messages. Your >>client is probably first doing an append of the message to the >>destination folder (which is what's putting it over quota) then storing >>the delete flag of the original message and expunging. > > > I'm su

Re: moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread Chris Hilts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Is it wise to modify these clients to instead FETCH, delete/expunge, then > STORE? Sounds like a recipe for lost messages should anything go wrong.. What happens if as you FETCH, new messages arrive and take up just enough quota that the STORE would

Re: moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread John Madden
> Sounds like a recipe for lost messages should anything go wrong.. What > happens if as you FETCH, new messages arrive and take up just enough quota > that the STORE would put it over quota? What do you do with the message? 4th and 15. Punt. That's certainly a tough situation. So what *is* the

Re: moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread Lars Kristiansen
>> Sounds like a recipe for lost messages should anything go wrong.. What >> happens if as you FETCH, new messages arrive and take up just enough >> quota >> that the STORE would put it over quota? What do you do with the message? > > 4th and 15. Punt. > > That's certainly a tough situation. So w

Re: moving message on nearly full mailbox with IMAP

2005-07-01 Thread Ken Murchison
Lars Kristiansen wrote: Sounds like a recipe for lost messages should anything go wrong.. What happens if as you FETCH, new messages arrive and take up just enough quota that the STORE would put it over quota? What do you do with the message? 4th and 15. Punt. That's certainly a tough situat

Getting Sieve to Run from cyrus.conf

2005-07-01 Thread Forrest Aldrich
I installed the lastest cyrus, compiled from the FreeBSD port. I'm having a problem with timsieved not running as it's configured: sieve cmd="timsieved" listen="sieve" prefork=0 >From the docs I read, this is correct. If I telnet to my local machine (by IP, not 127.0.0.1) there's no respon

Re: Getting Sieve to Run from cyrus.conf

2005-07-01 Thread Ken Murchison
Forrest Aldrich wrote: I installed the lastest cyrus, compiled from the FreeBSD port. I'm having a problem with timsieved not running as it's configured: sieve cmd="timsieved" listen="sieve" prefork=0 From the docs I read, this is correct. If I telnet to my local machine (by IP, not 127

Re: Getting Sieve to Run from cyrus.conf

2005-07-01 Thread Forrest Aldrich
No it is not, but would that prevent it from running. Port 2000 is allocated to "callback" (tcp|udp) in /etc/services. Ken Murchison wrote: > Forrest Aldrich wrote: > >> I installed the lastest cyrus, compiled from the FreeBSD port. >> >> I'm having a problem with timsieved not running as it's

Re: Getting Sieve to Run from cyrus.conf

2005-07-01 Thread Forrest Aldrich
Okay, I commented out "callback" in /etc/services and used Sieve.  I can connect with "sieveshell", but this appears to be a problem still: # sieveshell myserver.domain.com connecting to myserver.domain.com Please enter your password: Please enter your password: perl in free(): error: junk p