Re: API to write to lmtp directly

2003-07-09 Thread mb
At 11:52 +0530 Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: >Is there an API available with which I can directly write to lmtp >instead of sending a mail Er.. LMTP? :) >I am presently using postfix and sending the mail, But I believe that >calling an smtp agent has its own overheads. >I am sending 10-15 messa

RE: imap mailbox name

2003-07-09 Thread Brasseur Valéry
in this set : !"#$%*;<=>@[]^_'{|} what are the REAL invalid char for an IMAP folder, and what are those which Cyrus refused, and why ? did some of them will need m-utf7 encoding ? thanks > -Original Message- > From: Rob Siemborski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 03,

[Warning: little off-topic] Re: API to write to lmtp directly

2003-07-09 Thread foobar
Hi, On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: > Is there an API available with which I can directly write to lmtp > instead of sending a mail > > I am presently using postfix and sending the mail, But I believe that > calling an smtp agent has its own overheads. > I am sending 10-15 mess

Re: Question about Sieve and "filters"

2003-07-09 Thread foobar
Yes agreed, I tried to hint about this while ago (see sieve & spamassassin) and Rob said there was no proper plugin-support, it would need COMPATIBILITY or SUPPORTED-things from timseved in login if there is not sa supported or not and such things so it would be pretty complicated or not. On Tue,

Very slow deletion of user mailboxes?

2003-07-09 Thread Andrew McNamara
We're having a problem where deletion of a user by the admin is taking about 30 seconds. I've attached an abreviated truss of the imapd while this is taking place. It shows a long string of: 18679: stat("/mail/vmb1/var/mailboxes.db", 0xFFBEEA68) = 0 18679: fcntl(5, F_SETLKW, 0xFFBEEAE0)

Re: [SLE] Postfix-Cyrus-Web-cyradm Problem...

2003-07-09 Thread Tarjei Huse
Have you created the mailbox using cyradm? Tarjei I've run into problems, and I can't find any solution wherever I search, maybe someone here can help out? I've set up my mail system strictly according to a HOW-TO I found, http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Postfix-Cyrus-Web-cyradm-HOWTO/index.html the s

Re: Question about Sieve and "filters"

2003-07-09 Thread Michael Fair
> Yes agreed, > > I tried to hint about this while ago (see sieve & spamassassin) and Rob > said there was no proper plugin-support, it would need > COMPATIBILITY or SUPPORTED-things from timseved in login if there is not > sa supported or not and such things so it would be pretty complicated or no

Postfix configuration question

2003-07-09 Thread Tarjei Huse
Hi, After upgrading to Postfix 2.0.6 I'm having problems posting to Cyrus Imapd shared folders. the reason is explained in the Postfix faq as beeing because Postfix does not post to unknown users. (see http://www.postfix.org/faq.html#bogus). I quite like that feature, as it reduces the amount

Re: Postfix configuration question

2003-07-09 Thread Bob Tito
--On woensdag 9 juli 2003 14:33 +0200 Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, After upgrading to Postfix 2.0.6 I'm having problems posting to Cyrus Imapd shared folders. the reason is explained in the Postfix faq as beeing because Postfix does not post to unknown users. (see http://www.postfix

Re: Postfix configuration question

2003-07-09 Thread Tarjei Huse
Hi, After upgrading to Postfix 2.0.6 I'm having problems posting to Cyrus Imapd shared folders. the reason is explained in the Postfix faq as beeing because Postfix does not post to unknown users. (see http://www.postfix.org/faq.html#bogus). I quite like that feature, as it reduces the amount of s

Re: Getting deperate.. And REALLY confused!

2003-07-09 Thread Etienne Goyer
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:08:15PM +0200, Anders Norrbring wrote: > Oh, if I do the web-cyradm test page, it tells me that PEAR isn't up2date, I > got the package from http://www.horde.org/pear/ as the page pointed to, > still same result.. You can see the page on > http://www.the-server.net/web-cy

Re: Question about Sieve and "filters"

2003-07-09 Thread Ken Murchison
Michael Fair wrote: Hey all, I have a general question/suggestion regarding Sieve. It seems to me that it would be useful to be able to install filter plugins that could transform mail messages as they were processed. This would be a simple command, like: filter :spamassassin http://www.ietf

Re: imap mailbox name

2003-07-09 Thread Ken Murchison
Brasseur Valéry wrote: in this set : !"#$%*;<=>@[]^_'{|} what are the REAL invalid char for an IMAP folder, Sift through the grammar in RFC 3501. and what are those which Cyrus refused, Anything not in GOODCHARS in mboxname.c. and why ? If the two lists above don't match (other than '.'),

Re: [PROPOSAL] Sieve for shared mailboxes

2003-07-09 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Mueller wrote: Actually, my intent wasn't to _store_ a script via IMAP ANNOTATEMORE. I was only intending to _select_ (activate) a script via the annotation. I still anticipate using MANAGESIEVE to do the upload/download. Would it be hard to add the ability to store scripts as well? It wou

Re: API to write to lmtp directly

2003-07-09 Thread Ramprasad A Padmanabhan
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 13:13, mb wrote: At 11:52 +0530 Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: >Is there an API available with which I can directly write to lmtp >instead of sending a mail Er.. LMTP? :) >I am presently using postfix and sending the mail, But I believe that >calling an smtp agent has

RE: Getting deperate.. And REALLY confused!

2003-07-09 Thread Andrew Brink
Are you trying to do SMTP Auth within your mail client or not? Andrew -Original Message- From: Anders Norrbring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cyrus Info list; Web Cyrus admin list Subject: Getting deperate.. And REALLY confused! I

Re: API to write to lmtp directly

2003-07-09 Thread Ken Murchison
Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 13:13, mb wrote: At 11:52 +0530 Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: Is there an API available with which I can directly write to lmtp instead of sending a mail Er.. LMTP? :) I am presently using postfix and sending the mail, But I believe that c

Re: API to write to lmtp directly

2003-07-09 Thread mb
At 18:57 +0530 Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: >It is not that my server is getting loaded up because of the mails. >After I limt the number of concurrent lmtp connections I am able to >reduce the db lock errors to a great extent. Now I have set max lmtp >processes as 100 , But what will happen if

Re: sieve script not running?

2003-07-09 Thread Hank Beatty
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 16:11, Ken Murchison wrote: > Hank Beatty wrote: > > > Ken, > > > > Thanks for all of your help. I still haven't gotten this to work and > > would like to insert some debugging stuff to go to syslog. Could you > > tell me where in the code I should start? > > I'd add some s

Re: APPEND vs RFC2822 vs STD0011

2003-07-09 Thread Edward Reid
At 01:30 PM -0400 7/7/03, John Alton Tamplin wrote: > That's what sieve is for -- do it in the server and you won't have to > rely on a particular client doing it for you. OTOH, if I do it in my client, then I don't have to rely on all the servers I have to deal with all running sieve. They don't,

Re: Question about Sieve and "filters"

2003-07-09 Thread Cyrus Daboo
Hi Michael, --On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 9:38 PM -0700 Michael Fair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | What do others think about this? | Would this simple "pass through" filtering be useful? | I'm primarily thinking of Spam catchers, Virus Scanners, | and any other use where shoving the email through a

Re: APPEND vs RFC2822 vs STD0011

2003-07-09 Thread Cyrus Daboo
Hi Edward, --On Wednesday, July 9, 2003 11:58 AM -0400 Edward Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> Allowing null characters in particular is problematic for any code |> that |> uses null-terminated strings for messages or parts of messages, and | | Using null-terminated strings with data that migh

Re: APPEND vs RFC2822 vs STD0011

2003-07-09 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Edward Reid wrote: Obviously there's a problem with the RFC in this case, in that it makes a recommendation to the client but no recommendation or requirement for the server. But the RFC clearly says that the client is allowed to store a non-RFC2822 message, if it has a valid reason. Nowhere do I

Re: Question about Sieve and "filters"

2003-07-09 Thread Michael Fair
> Hi Michael, > > --On Tuesday, July 8, 2003 9:38 PM -0700 Michael Fair > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | What do others think about this? > | Would this simple "pass through" filtering be useful? > | I'm primarily thinking of Spam catchers, Virus Scanners, > | and any other use where shoving the

Re: APPEND vs RFC2822 vs STD0011

2003-07-09 Thread Edward Reid
At 12:28 PM -0400 7/9/03, Cyrus Daboo wrote: > On the NULL issue, IMAP does not allow bare NULLs in any data that >either > the server or client sends. If you check the formal syntax you will >see > that the 'literal' element used to send the message content in an >APPEND > explicitly excludes NULL

Log message: No worthy mechs found

2003-07-09 Thread Scott Bronson
I have tons of log messages (level=notice, log=auth) from "perl" claiming: Jul 8 11:26:46 eden cyrus/imapd[30661]: DIGEST-MD5 server step 2 Jul 8 11:26:46 eden perl: DIGEST-MD5 client step 3 Jul 9 10:33:22 eden perl: No worthy mechs found Well, this sure sounds SASL-related, not Pe

Re: APPEND vs RFC2822 vs STD0011

2003-07-09 Thread John Alton Tamplin
Edward Reid wrote: What RFC3501 says is The APPEND command appends the literal argument as a new message to the end of the specified destination mailbox. This argument SHOULD be in the format of an [RFC-2822] message. Since it's the client that constructs the literal, it appears t

Re: Log message: No worthy mechs found

2003-07-09 Thread Ken Murchison
Scott Bronson wrote: I have tons of log messages (level=notice, log=auth) from "perl" claiming: Jul 8 11:26:46 eden cyrus/imapd[30661]: DIGEST-MD5 server step 2 Jul 8 11:26:46 eden perl: DIGEST-MD5 client step 3 Jul 9 10:33:22 eden perl: No worthy mechs found Well, this sure sound

full restore to a different machine

2003-07-09 Thread Andreas Freyvogel
Hi all, I have a simple question, with hopefully an equally simple answer: How may I do a full restore of Machine "A" to Machine "B"? I know I can do a full restore of Machine "A" to Machine "A", but when I try to use the redirection below as: --- Redirections -

RE: full restore to a different machine

2003-07-09 Thread Andreas Freyvogel
Sorry ... I sent this off to the wrong list. I apologise. -Andreas -Original Message- From: Andreas Freyvogel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:30 PM To: Cyrus List Subject: full restore to a different machine Hi all, I have a simple question, with hopefully an

Re: Very slow deletion of user mailboxes?

2003-07-09 Thread Andrew McNamara
>We're having a problem where deletion of a user by the admin is taking >about 30 seconds. I've attached an abreviated truss of the imapd while >this is taking place. It shows a long string of: A more detailed truss: fstat(5, 0xFFBEEAF0)= 0 stat("/mail/vmb1/var/mailbox

2.2.0.a on FreeBSD 5-current - Sieve not working.

2003-07-09 Thread James Satterfield
Sieve doesn't seem to be processing mail. My script looks good.   boingo# /root/test 100. /home/jsatter/mysievefiling message '100.' into 'INBOX.Hotmail' boingo# Yay!   My script is active. > listsmartsievemysieve  <- active script> Cyrus can read everything. boingo# pwd/usr/local/var/imap/s

Re: Log message: No worthy mechs found

2003-07-09 Thread Scott Bronson
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 14:05, Ken Murchison wrote: > It looks like your perl script is trying to authenticate to your server > using DIGEST-MD5 and failing. ... > Yes. Read doc/options.html in the SASL distro. I'm guessing that you want: > sasl_mech_list: PLAIN Thanks, Ken. That helped a

Re: 2.2.0.a on FreeBSD 5-current - Sieve not working.

2003-07-09 Thread Carl P. Corliss
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 09:12 pm, James Satterfield wrote: > Sieve doesn't seem to be processing mail. My script looks good. Try updating to the most current CVS version. There are some fixes for sieve in there that -might- fix your problem... good luck :) -- Carl P. Corliss System Administr

Re: 2.2.0.a on FreeBSD 5-current - Sieve not working.

2003-07-09 Thread James Satterfield
I was hoping to stay in the freebsd ports "box." But I guess this is alpha. So, cvs, here we go. Don't suppose there's going to be a new 2.2.x release in the near future? James. - Original Message - From: "Carl P. Corliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James Satterfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> C