sasl_pwcheck_method: auxprop

2002-09-30 Thread Carlos Velasco
Hi, I have just upgraded to latest CVS SASL and IMAPD (2.2 branch). Now, when I try to authenticate through cyradm or pop3 or imap using sasl_pwcheck_method: auxprop in imapd.conf, I can not authenticate and I get this into auth log: Sep 30 11:12:34 auth:debug imap: imap[32561]: could not find

Re: Can't authorize via postfix

2002-09-30 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Galen Johnson wrote: > Actually, I was wondering when the Debian chroot of postfix would rear > it's ugly head. There is really no reason to chroot postfix. Just edit Of course there is: Security. Watch as I try to find a way to chroot Cyrus as well... (it should actua

Re: User mailbox renames

2002-09-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Quoting Roland Pope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > I am running cyrus-imapd 2.1.9 and I would like to be able to rename a > user's mailbox. > When I try a rename using cyradm, it tells me "Operation is not supported > on > mailbox". From having a look at the source, it appears you can only renam

Rename bug more serious than thought...

2002-09-30 Thread Rob Mueller
Using cyrus 2.1.9, it seems that each time you rename a folder, it adds to any quota that folder is under... Connected to xyz.com. Escape character is '^]'. * OK xyz.com Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.9 server ready . login blah . OK User logged in . getquotaroot inbox * QUOTAROOT inbox user.blah * QUOTA user

Re: Can't authorize via postfix

2002-09-30 Thread Scott Russell
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:04:40AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Galen Johnson wrote: > > Actually, I was wondering when the Debian chroot of postfix would rear > > it's ugly head. There is really no reason to chroot postfix. Just edit > > Of course there is

Re: Rename bug more serious than thought...

2002-09-30 Thread Scott Russell
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:26:10PM +1000, Rob Mueller wrote: > Using cyrus 2.1.9, it seems that each time you rename a folder, it adds to > any quota that folder is under... > > Connected to xyz.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > * OK xyz.com Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.9 server ready > . login blah > . OK

outlook 2000 & imap delivery problem

2002-09-30 Thread Valmar Joandi
Hello, I have cyrus-imap running on linux and appr 70 win98 client machines with outlook 2000. I'm not quite sure wether its outlook or imap server problem. I have tracked down that sometimes when outlook is running and after message arrives to imap server , outlook is unable to get messa

Re: outlook 2000 & imap delivery problem

2002-09-30 Thread Tijl Dullers
I had exactely the same problem , especially with people who had or a slow PC or a whole lot of different E-mail folders on the IMAP server ( Or a combination of both ) , I replaced outlook with Mozilla 1.1 or Netscape mail client and the problem was solved, I tried Outlook 2000 with and

Re: Rename bug more serious than thought...

2002-09-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Mueller wrote: > > Using cyrus 2.1.9, it seems that each time you rename a folder, it adds to > any quota that folder is under... > > Connected to xyz.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > * OK xyz.com Cyrus IMAP4 v2.1.9 server ready > . login blah > . OK User logged in > . getquotaroot inbo

Re: Can't authorize via postfix

2002-09-30 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Scott Russell wrote: > I don't know if I would bother running Cyrus in chroot since it's a > closed box application anyway. You certainly could. It limits the damage one could cause by crashing cyrus... > the security on any box I own by unplugging it from the network, but

Re: SETACL on user mailbox

2002-09-30 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Rob Mueller wrote: > Now I argued that the current behaviour was actually against the RFC's > description of what the 'a' right meant, mostly because this is the > behaviour we want to see :). Others argued that because at CMU there's lots > of shared folders that users want

Re: SETACL on user mailbox

2002-09-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Siemborski wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Rob Mueller wrote: > > > Now I argued that the current behaviour was actually against the RFC's > > description of what the 'a' right meant, mostly because this is the > > behaviour we want to see :). Others argued that because at CMU there's lots

need help with notify_no.c

2002-09-30 Thread Christoph R
I'm trying to get my cyrus-imapd-2.0.16 installation to call a php script on incomming mails. I've added something like: system ( "/notify.php user mailbox message" ); to the imap/notify_no.c but now sendmail always says cyrus exited with EX_TEMPFAIL. How can I get notify_no.c to call my script w

Converting email from a bsd style email box

2002-09-30 Thread Vernon A. Fort
To all,   Is it possible to read am email message from an existing BSD –style mbox file and use the cyrus deliver agent to inject the mail verses simple copying the file into the specific folder:       cat {message} | formail –s /usr/libexec/deliver –m . {userid} {return}   Whe

Problems with IMAPS and POPS

2002-09-30 Thread Felix Cuello
Hello! I'm actually using Cyrus 2.1.8 with SASL 2.1.7, and I have some problems to config my Cyrus to accept SSL connections. Here is my 3 first lines of "netstat -at" Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp0 0 *:imaps

Re: Rename bug more serious than thought...

2002-09-30 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ken Murchison wrote: > My guess is that it has been introduced fairly recently. I've attached a patch to correct the problem (which has also been committed to cvs, and I assume will be in the 2.2 branch as well later today). Any problems let me know (or reopen bug #1425).

Re: Sieve Vacation syntax

2002-09-30 Thread Greg Roberts
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Ken Murchison wrote: [] > ALL of the relevent specifications (RFCs, IDs, etc) are listed in > doc/specs.html > > I start to wonder why I keep this up to date if nobody is going to look at it > :( Ken, Here's a little happier spin for you... some people do read them and

Re: outlook 2000 & imap delivery problem

2002-09-30 Thread Tijl Dullers
I do not see how a patch can solve bad client side implementation of microsoft IMAP client , Even if this patch solves the problem Netscape Mail client if a far better and more reliable choice. Luc Germain wrote: >Hi! > >Are you using idled on your server? If yes, you might want to try t

Re: Problems with IMAPS and POPS

2002-09-30 Thread Connie Starr Fensky
First of all, it looks like you did not update your cyrus.conf from a 2.0 version. That is the cause of the ctl_mboxlist vs ctl_cyrusdb error message in the log. Sorry, I cannot help with the secure shell part. c* - Original Message - From: "Felix Cuello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL P

RE: outlook 2000 & imap delivery problem

2002-09-30 Thread Luc Germain
Hi! Are you using idled on your server? If yes, you might want to try the patch described in this message: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&msg=17 144 It solved a similar problem for me. Luc. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI

Re: Problems with IMAPS and POPS

2002-09-30 Thread Felix Cuello
Were Can I find the newest and most generic cyrus.conf or/and documentation to make cyrus.conf from scratch Thanks Felix --- Felix Cuello [EMAIL PROTECTED] Qodiga/its http://www.qodiga.com Santa Fe 882 - Piso 13 - Of."E" Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA > Fi

Re: Problems with IMAPS and POPS

2002-09-30 Thread Connie Starr Fensky
It should be in /master/conf directory of distribution. I use normal.conf, and just copy it to my /etc directory as cyrus.conf. Does this help? c* - Original Message - From: "Felix Cuello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday

Re: Problems with IMAPS and POPS

2002-09-30 Thread Igor Brezac
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Felix Cuello wrote: > > Hello! > > I'm actually using Cyrus 2.1.8 with SASL 2.1.7, and I have some > problems to config my Cyrus to accept SSL connections. > > Here is my 3 first lines of "netstat -at" > > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address

Re: Problems with IMAPS and POPS

2002-09-30 Thread Felix Cuello
Yes!!!... it is working! I've just added this three lines to my /etc/imapd.conf tls_cert_file: /usr/share/ssl/certs/cert.pem tls_key_file: /usr/share/ssl/certs/cert.key tls_require_cert: 0 And IMAPS & POPS (pops not tested yet) works fine!! thanks a lot! Felix ---

Problems with GSSAPI authentication?

2002-09-30 Thread Josh Huber
I'm having some bizarre issues with krb 5 authentication and Cyrus imapd v2.1.9. The really odd this about this is I get different behavior when I try from my user account and when I try from root. Here's the output of "imtest -m GSSAPI mail" as root: S: * OK mail.paradoxical.net Cyrus IMAP4 v2

Re: User mailbox renames

2002-09-30 Thread Roland Pope
- Original Message - From: "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:15 AM >>The problem I have then is > >that I lose the original subscriptions and seen states? > >I can fiddle the user subscription file, but the seen states are stored in > >a skiplist DB and

Re: Time has come to stop with /usr/local path pollution!

2002-09-30 Thread Joe Rhett
> > However it does seem that when explicit paths are called for certain > > componants they should be placed in line before the assumed system paths. > I agree 100% that the paths should be honored. However, since it works > for most people, and testing is pretty annoying (as ken stated), I'm n

Re: Time has come to stop with /usr/local path pollution!

2002-09-30 Thread Joe Rhett
> The next time somebody is frustrated by the software and wants to rant about > how much of their time the developers wasted, take a step back and remember how > much time and money they actually _saved_ you. Having been the guilty party which kicked off this thread, I want to step back and m

Re: Time has come to stop with /usr/local path pollution!

2002-09-30 Thread Joe Rhett
> First off, why did you feel the need to send this directly to me? Cyrus > is not _my_ software, I'm just a contributor. Secondly, I can > understand your frustration, but your shitty attitude ain't gonna help. Sorry, I misunderstood clearly, as I thought you were heading up the imapd 2.2 br