On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Rob Mueller wrote:
>> squatter would really benefit from incremental updates. At the moment a
>> single new message in a mailbox containing 20k messages causes it to read
>> in all the existing messages in order to regenerate the index.
>
> We spoke to Ken about this ages back
> squatter would really benefit from incremental updates. At the moment a
> single new message in a mailbox containing 20k messages causes it to read
> in all the existing messages in order to regenerate the index.
We spoke to Ken about this ages back, and even offered to pay for the work
to make
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Vincent Fox wrote:
> I have seen squatter run more than 24 hours.
>
> This is on a large mail filesystem. I've seen it start up a
> second one while the first is still running. Should I:
>
> 1) Forget about squatter
> 2) Remove from cyrus.conf, run from cron every other day
I have seen squatter run more than 24 hours.
This is on a large mail filesystem. I've seen it start up a
second one while the first is still running. Should I:
1) Forget about squatter
2) Remove from cyrus.conf, run from cron every other day
3) Find some option to cyrus.conf for same effect as
