On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Janne Peltonen wrote:
>> If you feel that your filesystem/buffercache will do a good job at
>> writing things out to disk, and you've got battery-backed cache on
>> your storage, you should be relatively well off.
>
> But if I were to turn s
> If you feel that your filesystem/buffercache will do a good job at
> writing things out to disk, and you've got battery-backed cache on
> your storage, you should be relatively well off.
But if I were to turn skiplist_unsafe on, and the OS crashed - or, say,
the cluster system
your filesystem/buffercache will do a good job at
writing things out to disk, and you've got battery-backed cache on
your storage, you should be relatively well off.
-rob
On Nov 30, 2007, at 19:59, Vincent Fox wrote:
> How "unsafe" is setting in imapd.conf
>
> skiplist_unsa
How "unsafe" is setting in imapd.conf
skiplist_unsafe: 1
Our /var/cyrus/imap filesystem is on a ZFS mirror set on
arrays with dual controllers so OS and/or hardware
corruption is remote.
The application can scramble it but that can happen
whether we have sync or not eh?
Anything I
