On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Robin M. wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Robin M. wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Simon Matter wrote:
> >
> > > > When I reply to a message all the existing messages have their flags set
> > > > as new. If I reply to a message that I have previously replied to all the
> > > > me
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Robin M. wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Simon Matter wrote:
>
> > >
> > > When I reply to a message all the existing messages have their flags set
> > > as new. If I reply to a message that I have previously replied to all the
> > > messages are -not- flagged as new, but the mes
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Simon Matter wrote:
> >
> > When I reply to a message all the existing messages have their flags set
> > as new. If I reply to a message that I have previously replied to all the
> > messages are -not- flagged as new, but the message that I replied to is
> > marked as new. I h
>
> When I reply to a message all the existing messages have their flags set
> as new. If I reply to a message that I have previously replied to all the
> messages are -not- flagged as new, but the message that I replied to is
> marked as new. I have tested this behavior using Outlook Express and
>
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Robin M. wrote:
> When I reply to a message all the existing messages have their flags set
> as new. If I reply to a message that I have previously replied to all the
> messages are -not- flagged as new, but the message that I replied to is
> marked as new. I have tested this
When I reply to a message all the existing messages have their flags set
as new. If I reply to a message that I have previously replied to all the
messages are -not- flagged as new, but the message that I replied to is
marked as new. I have tested this behavior using Outlook Express and
Squirrelma