On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 03:10:47PM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> Every MTA along the way should add a message-id if there isn't one.
qmail don't add message-id for any messages that comes through
smtp (qmail-smtpd).
Regards,
P.Y. Adi Prasaja
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 16:48, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Stephen Grier wrote:
>
> > We use Exim here. The messages do have a Message-Id: header, but with an
> > empty value. I assume Exim will not add or alter the msg-id in this
> > case.
>
> Any idea why this one user is getting
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:52:02 +0100 (BST) David Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Stephen Grier wrote:
>
> > We use Exim here. The messages do have a Message-Id: header, but with an
> > empty value.
>
> Eeep. That's no fun at all.
>
> > I assume Exim will not add or alter
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Stephen Grier wrote:
> Yes, the messages do have a Message-Id: header with an empty value. I've
> identified 2 domains which appear to be doing this.
>
> Would it be reasonable to have lmtpd not add an entry to the deliver db
> for zero-length message-ids?
It would be reasona
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Stephen Grier wrote:
> We use Exim here. The messages do have a Message-Id: header, but with an
> empty value. I assume Exim will not add or alter the msg-id in this
> case.
Any idea why this one user is getting a bunch of messages like this, or
what might be generating them?
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Stephen Grier wrote:
> We use Exim here. The messages do have a Message-Id: header, but with an
> empty value.
Eeep. That's no fun at all.
> I assume Exim will not add or alter the msg-id in this case.
I suspect this is the case, though arguably Exim should do something abo
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 14:27, David Carter wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Stephen Grier wrote:
>
> > I have noticed that this has been happening on other occasions, where
> > lmtpd does a duplicate_check and then a duplicate_mark on zero length
> > message-ids. This raises the possibility that the s
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 14:10, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
> -- Stephen Grier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on
> Freitag, 27. Juni 2003 13:47 Uhr +0100 regarding non-existent msgids &
> duplicate delivery suppression:
>
> > I have noticed that this
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Stephen Grier wrote:
> I have noticed that this has been happening on other occasions, where
> lmtpd does a duplicate_check and then a duplicate_mark on zero length
> message-ids. This raises the possibility that the server is suppressing
> messages that are not duplicates, bu
-- Stephen Grier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on
Freitag, 27. Juni 2003 13:47 Uhr +0100 regarding non-existent msgids &
duplicate delivery suppression:
I have noticed that this has been happening on other occasions, where
lmtpd does a duplicate_check and then a dupl
Hi,
We are currently running cyrus-imapd-2.1.11 with duplicate delivery
suppression enabled.
One of our users complained that they were not receiving their mail.
Having looked at the logs I noticed a string of entries like the
following:
Jun 25 13:11:43 machine lmtpd[18521]:
duplicate_check:
11 matches
Mail list logo
