Re: moving from 2.0 to 2.1.3

2002-04-06 Thread Jeremy Howard
> > >Oh, and using BerkeleyDB for deliver and tls stuff seems to be >fine. The number of lockers will climb during peak periods, but >then taper back down when traffic subsides. It just seems like >mailboxes.db was an application not terribly well suited for it. > We got deadlocks using BDB for

Re: moving from 2.0 to 2.1.3

2002-04-06 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 22:19:02 +0300, > Nick Ustinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nu) writes: nu> We are planning to switch production server from 2.0.16 to 2.1.3/skiplist. nu> The system has about 60 mailboxes and is quite heavily loaded (seeing nu> alot of db lockers). Are there any hidden c

Re: moving from 2.0 to 2.1.3

2002-04-03 Thread Simon Matter
Nick Ustinov schrieb: > > We are planning to switch production server from 2.0.16 to 2.1.3/skiplist. > The system has about 60 mailboxes and is quite heavily loaded (seeing > alot of db lockers). Are there any hidden catches people i should avoid? > Besides converting mailboxes file using cvt

moving from 2.0 to 2.1.3

2002-04-03 Thread Nick Ustinov
We are planning to switch production server from 2.0.16 to 2.1.3/skiplist. The system has about 60 mailboxes and is quite heavily loaded (seeing alot of db lockers). Are there any hidden catches people i should avoid? Besides converting mailboxes file using cvt_cyrusdb is there anything else I