RE: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-02 Thread Nick Ustinov
Re: lmtpd locking continued > I ran strace on lmtpd and noticed that it sticks with connecting to > notify_unix socket. I recompiled it with-notify=no and it seems to work fine > now (and much faster too :) > > Ken, ignore last email with strace, it was all right (my fault) > I though

Re: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Jeremy Howard
> I ran strace on lmtpd and noticed that it sticks with connecting to > notify_unix socket. I recompiled it with-notify=no and it seems to work fine > now (and much faster too :) > > Ken, ignore last email with strace, it was all right (my fault) > I thought notify_unix.c was ignoring failure to c

RE: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Nick Ustinov
: Lawrence Greenfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 22:37 To: Nick Ustinov; Ken Murchison Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: lmtpd locking continued Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 13:47:01 -0400 From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>

Re: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 13:47:01 -0400 From: Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=538 > 250 2.1.0 ok > >>> RCPT To: > 250 2.1.5 ok > >>> DATA > 354 go ahead > >>> . Hmm. This *should* have given you: 554 5.6.0 Message has no

Re: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Ken Murchison
Nick Ustinov wrote: > > Larry, > > just did that and it sent 48 out of 721 msgs in mqueue.. And froze here: > > Running /var/spool/mqueue/f91HRse04091 (sequence 49 of 721) > >>> RSET > 250 2.0.0 ok > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Using cached ESMTP connection to localhost > via cyrus... > >>> MAIL F

Re: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
From: Nick Ustinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 18:02:16 +0200 Ken, just pulled latest cvs version, still the same. As for too many files open, I have echo 32768 >/etc/fs/file-max Did you nuke your existing duplicate delivery db and run ctl_cyrusdb -r? As you notice

RE: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Nick Ustinov
and is accessible via IMAP -Original Message- From: Lawrence Greenfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 19:46 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Nick Ustinov Subject: Re: lmtpd locking continued From: Nick Ustinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 1 Oc

RE: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Nick Ustinov
ct: Re: lmtpd locking continued Nick Ustinov wrote: > > Sorry, > > it's 2.1.0pre, pulled sep 26th. Try pulling it again. I fixed a file descriptor leak (which I created) in lmtpd. Your lmtpd _may_ be running up against the fd limit. Do you get any complaints about too man

Re: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Ken Murchison
Nick Ustinov wrote: > > Sorry, > > it's 2.1.0pre, pulled sep 26th. Try pulling it again. I fixed a file descriptor leak (which I created) in lmtpd. Your lmtpd _may_ be running up against the fd limit. Do you get any complaints about too many open files? Ken -- Kenneth Murchison Ocean

RE: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Nick Ustinov
From: Amos Gouaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 15:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: lmtpd locking continued >>>>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:22:27 +0200 , >>>>> Nick Ustinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nu) writes: nu> And that'

Re: lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:22:27 +0200 , > Nick Ustinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nu) writes: nu> And that's the place, where lmtpd freezes: nu> Oct 1 14:27:09 satan lmtpd[5687]: duplicate_check: nu> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> user.bforce 0 You should probably indicate what version of Cyrus

lmtpd locking continued

2001-10-01 Thread Nick Ustinov
And that's the place, where lmtpd freezes: Oct 1 14:27:09 satan lmtpd[5687]: duplicate_check: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> user.bforce 0 Nick Ustinov Enterprise Solutions Group Director Vide Infra Grupa SIA 40 Brivibas St, Riga, Latvia, LV 1050 phone: +371 7812294 fax: +371 7812297 http: