Luca Olivetti wrote:
>
> Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
>
> > Cyrus does recycle processes.
>
> Even if you set prefork 0 in cyrus.conf?
Yes.
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: imapd timeout
>
>Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 19:32:44 -0700
>From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: Cyrus-Info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Cyrus does recycle processes. Unix forking is amazingly slow compared
&g
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
> Cyrus does recycle processes.
Even if you set prefork 0 in cyrus.conf?
--
Luca Olivetti
Wetron Automatización S.A. http://www.wetron.es/
Tel. +34 93 5883004 Fax +34 93 5883007
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 19:32:44 -0700
From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Cyrus-Info <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cyrus does recycle processes. Unix forking is amazingly slow compared
> to not forking and on servers that receive many connections a second
> this performance twea
> Cyrus does recycle processes. Unix forking is amazingly slow compared
> to not forking and on servers that receive many connections a second
> this performance tweak is vital.
That explains it; thanks for the explanation.
(Still, even 10 forks/second seems entirely do-able. While I don't
di
Good point :)
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence Greenfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 7:01 PM
To: 'David Wright'; 'Cyrus-Info'; Tim Pushor
Subject: Re: imapd timeout
From: "Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: T
From: "Tim Pushor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 18:41:46 -0600
I wonder how many IMAP processes are short lived enough to make a
difference? I know at least on my servers they are fairly long running.
If you have 6500 simulataneous connections and 7 new connections per
: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 5:48 PM
To: Cyrus-Info; David Wright
Subject: Re: imapd timeout
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Does cyrus perhaps "recycle" imapd processes rather than killing them
and
starting new ones? If
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 14:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Does cyrus perhaps "recycle" imapd processes rather than killing them and
starting new ones? If so, what is the logic behind this? (Unix forking is
remarkably fast, and starting fresh each time
Using 2.0.16 on Linux 2.2.19.
I am having trouble with imapd daemons hanging around for a long time. I
currently (21 May) have some imapd daemons that have been hanging around
for over two weeks (4 May). It is just possible that a couple users have
been sending keep-alives that long, but I have
10 matches
Mail list logo
