Re: imapd 2.2.10 performance

2010-01-18 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
www.sonicle.com -- Da: Dietmar Rieder A: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Data: 18 gennaio 2010 18.16.35 CET Oggetto: Re: imapd 2.2.10 performance On 01/18/2010 05:44 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: Thanx so much for your reply. Yes, I forgot about some technical details... Systems are all

Re: imapd 2.2.10 performance

2010-01-18 Thread Dietmar Rieder
On 01/18/2010 05:44 PM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: > Thanx so much for your reply. > > Yes, I forgot about some technical details... > Systems are all Solaris 10 5/08, some are x86 multicores, some are sparc > T multicores, some > are virtual servers inside VMWare infrastructure, but I must say the > d

Re: imapd 2.2.10 performance

2010-01-18 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
ata: 18 gennaio 2010 17.11.55 CET Oggetto: Re: imapd 2.2.10 performance Hi, Quoting Gabriele Bulfon : Hi, in the recent months I started to have performance issues on some installations deployed happily for many years. I tried running a reconstruct of all mailboxes during the weekend, but no results.

Re: imapd 2.2.10 performance

2010-01-18 Thread Michael Menge
Hi, Quoting Gabriele Bulfon : Hi, in the recent months I started to have performance issues on some installations deployed happily for many years. I tried running a reconstruct of all mailboxes during the weekend, but no results. Maybe the amount of mail is now affecting imap performance?

imapd 2.2.10 performance

2010-01-18 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Hi, in the recent months I started to have performance issues on some installations deployed happily for many years. I tried running a reconstruct of all mailboxes during the weekend, but no results. Maybe the amount of mail is now affecting imap performance? These installations has 50-100 users,