Scott Adkins wrote:
cannot connect to saslauthd server: Connection refused
Failed to connect to socket /var/cyrus/imap/socket/lmtp for
local_cyrus_deliver
transport: Connection refused
error sending to idled: 0
The first thing I would do here is to use LMTP as a TCP socket instead of
a
--On Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:00 PM +0200 Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 18. Oktober 2006 11:25:09 +0100 Adam Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We deployed idled here over the summer on our main staff IMAP server, a
Sunfire v480 running Solaris 8 and cyrus-imap 2.2.
--On 18. Oktober 2006 11:25:09 +0100 Adam Stephens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We deployed idled here over the summer on our main staff IMAP server, a
Sunfire v480 running Solaris 8 and cyrus-imap 2.2.12. It typically has
about 13,000 concurrent IMAP processes
Wow, that's a lot of sessions! I'
Ken Murchison wrote:
Jorey Bump wrote:
Cyrus IMAP advertises IDLE, and the docs mention that the default method is
"poll", but shed little light on the use of idled as an alternative. Which
method is preferred, better performing (for users and/or servers), and
more robust?
idled will provi
Jorey Bump wrote:
Cyrus IMAP advertises IDLE, and the docs mention that the default method
is "poll", but shed little light on the use of idled as an alternative.
Which method is preferred, better performing (for users and/or servers),
and more robust?
idled will provide the client with ins
Cyrus IMAP advertises IDLE, and the docs mention that the default method
is "poll", but shed little light on the use of idled as an alternative.
Which method is preferred, better performing (for users and/or servers),
and more robust?
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyru
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different --with-idle
methods? Are there any rules of thumb on when one would be more
advisable to use than the others? Thanks.
Karl Boyken
--
Karl Boyken, system administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303A MLH, Dept. of Comp. Sci.
http://www.cs.ui