On Tue, 18 May 2004, Andreas wrote:
> Is it useful? Does it use too much resources? Is it not used that much,
> and as such not well tested?
Haven't really noticed it taking up too much resources myself.
In terms of it being useful, rather informal trial and error
experimentation here seemed to
What is the general perception towards the idled daemon? I see that
it is not used by default.
Is it useful? Does it use too much resources? Is it not used that much,
and as such not well tested?
I see that thunderbird 0.6 can use the IDLE extension and I like the idea
of the server notifying the
