RE: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread NiekR
, same result. what was cyrus ver that worked >fine for you? i tried 2.0.9 - it was just like 2.0.12. > >nick > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 19:55 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
This is a redhat 6.2 now I think. Helmut > nick > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 19:55 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: forking problem cd.. > > &

RE: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread Nick Ustinov
il 25, 2001 23:27 To: Nick Ustinov; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: forking problem cd.. Nick, we did not have the problem on Cyrus 1.5.14 (not using LMTP) on a Linux 2.2 kernel (Linux RedHat 6.0) Regards Niek Rijnbout At 21:46 25-04-2001 +0300, Nick Ustinov wrote: >well, it seems that this

Re: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello fellow listmembers, > > We switched to a new version of the cyrus imapd > (version 2.0.12) and i think we have encounted the > 'locking problem' that is being discussed here. > > What we are seeing here is that it takes a long > while for the greetings to sh

RE: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread Nick Ustinov
: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 19:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: forking problem cd.. Hello fellow listmembers, We switched to a new version of the cyrus imapd (version 2.0.12) and i think we have encounted the 'locking problem' that is being discussed here. What we

forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread rijnbout
Hello fellow listmembers, We switched to a new version of the cyrus imapd (version 2.0.12) and i think we have encounted the 'locking problem' that is being discussed here. What we are seeing here is that it takes a long while for the greetings to show even after the connection has been establ

Re: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
--- Simon Loader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > After some more testing we think that the main > problem > > is between lmtpd processes accessing the > > /var/imap/deliverdb databases. While reading a > source > > of imap/duplicate.c, there's a note next to > > get_db_name > > function saying

Re: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread mills
Helmut Apfelholz writes: > >I've just checked the CVS, duplicate.c hasn't been >changed at all, so the algorithm remains the same. I >also haven't seen any patch in the archives. The patch was submitted to the Cyrus bug reporting address some time ago. All it does, though, is to provide an eve

RE: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread Nick Ustinov
oader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:00 PM To: Helmut Apfelholz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: forking problem cd.. > After some more testing we think that the main problem > is between lmtpd processes accessing the > /var/imap/deliv

Re: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread Simon Loader
> After some more testing we think that the main problem > is between lmtpd processes accessing the > /var/imap/deliverdb databases. While reading a source > of imap/duplicate.c, there's a note next to > get_db_name > function saying that too many processes where > contending for the locks on del

Re: forking problem cd..

2001-04-25 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
> > This is a workaround. We really need a solution to > the > > problem. We will be looking into some alternatives > to > > sleepycats library for some of the databases. I > was > > thinking about trying the tdb library from samba > > project. > > What is the advantage of tdb over BerkeleyDB? I

Re: forking problem cd..

2001-04-24 Thread Dori . Seliskar
Helmut Apfelholz wrote: > This is a workaround. We really need a solution to the > problem. We will be looking into some alternatives to > sleepycats library for some of the databases. I was > thinking about trying the tdb library from samba > project. What is the advantage of tdb over BerkeleyD

Re: forking problem cd..

2001-04-24 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
; I have solved the problem my switching sendmail to > DeliverMode=q with 1m > > interval > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Helmut Apfelholz > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 19:04 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: forking problem cd..

2001-04-24 Thread Dori Seliskar
felholz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 19:04 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: forking problem cd.. > > Hi, > > here's some more info on 'forking problem'. We have > experienced this again t

RE: forking problem cd..

2001-04-24 Thread Nick Ustinov
I have solved the problem my switching sendmail to DeliverMode=q with 1m interval -Original Message- From: Helmut Apfelholz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 19:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: forking problem cd.. Hi

forking problem cd..

2001-04-24 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
Hi, here's some more info on 'forking problem'. We have experienced this again today. The server stopped showing the prompt at imap/pop ports. At that moment I was trying to run reconstruct, however it looks like it was unable to access /var/imap/deliverdb/db/__db.005 file the strace was showi