> While having a single server support multiple domains the way apache
> does would be swell, it's sounding like if these various performance
> issues folks are experiencing aren't resolved first, the
> multi-domain support will be a moot point. The again, I may not
> know what the hell I'm talki
> On Sat, 12 May 2001 12:56:41 +0200 (CEST),
> Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nj) writes:
nj> You mean, multithread the daemon? Or multithread cyrus? If you were to
nj> multithread cyrus, you'd have to do it with pop3, lmtpd and the other parts
nj> too. It would be nice, but I think tha
Hi!
On 12-May-2001 Amos Gouaux wrote:
> nj> unix domain socket. I think it would be even faster than DB3, because DB3
> has
> nj> to access and load (some of) the data and log files for each
> cyrus-instance.
>
> ^^^
> we
> On Sat, 12 May 2001 03:20:18 +0200 (CEST),
> Noll Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (nj) writes:
nj> I'm planning on doing a "mailbox-daemon", which will load all mailbox data
nj> into itself, and persist. It would communicate with the cyrus-server with a
nj> unix domain socket. I think it wo
Hi!
We've experienced the same problem with cyrus 2.0.xx as some of you have, it
seem the db3 part can sometimes "deadlock".
There is a partial solution: make cyrus use text files, instead of db3. You
have to modify one or two lines in the source, but sadly I don't have the
source here with me
