Re: [WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

That was a summary not how it came across. fair nuf. The ultimate fix upstream is for these files to not be included dealer's choice, of course but I can't go back in time to fix 2.2.12. really wasn't asking/expecting you to ... thx for your help! cheers, richard --- Cyrus Home Page:

Re: [WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: they come with the release distro: Fine, so just remove them, let them be regenerated, and move on with life. huh? Huh what, you said you did just this. and shared with you the results of making 'it' work on OSX 10.4.1. i've been trying to be hel

[WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

hi derrick, well it sure seems that com_err/et_list originate from / revolve around Kerberos. Kerberos uses them, and they are from MIT, but there are non-Kerberos things which do. Apple provides it with/due to Kerberos. clear. 1st, after a fresh DL, we still have the 'suspect': % grep e

Re: [WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

they come with the release distro: Fine, so just remove them, let them be regenerated, and move on with life. huh? you asked, i answered ... and shared with you the results of making 'it' work on OSX 10.4.1. i've been trying to be helpful ... why the sudden attitude change? richard ---

Re: [WORKAROUND SUCCESS] Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: they come with the release distro: Fine, so just remove them, let them be regenerated, and move on with life. The problem is that *our* compile_et doesn't match *your* libcom_err, in fact. So this step: manually recompile the .et files: % cd

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: hi derrick, a bit more info/data ... well it sure seems that com_err/et_list originate from / revolve around Kerberos. Kerberos uses them, and they are from MIT, but there are non-Kerberos things which do. Apple provides it with/due to Kerberos.

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

hi derrick, a bit more info/data ... well it sure seems that com_err/et_list originate from / revolve around Kerberos. so, I decided to try take Apple's Kerberos implementation out of the picture, and build my own. a build of MIT's krb5-1.4.1 (

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

hi, % which compile_et /usr/bin/compile_et % compile_et imap/imap_err.et Error Table "imap" has base -1904809472 Well, it writes out imap_err.h, imap_err.c, and the latter would have the reference. me ok. --> fresh DL of v2.2.12 % cd /usr/ports/cyrus/cyrus-imapd-2.2.

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: % which compile_et /usr/bin/compile_et % compile_et imap/imap_err.et Error Table "imap" has base -1904809472 Well, it writes out imap_err.h, imap_err.c, and the latter would have the reference. % ls -al /usr/ports/cyrus/cyrus-imap

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

hi again, Well, so, if you manually use compile_et from /usr/bin to compile the et file, does it emit a __et_list reference? Not the "et_file"; The et file. There are several. Ultimately you want them all, but for test purposes one will do imap/imap_err.et imap/nntp_err.et imap/mupdate_er

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: hi again, Well, so, if you manually use compile_et from /usr/bin to compile the et file, does it emit a __et_list reference? sorry, confused. "the et_file ..." -- which file in the imapd distro? Not the "et_file"; The et file. There are several. Ult

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

hi again, Well, so, if you manually use compile_et from /usr/bin to compile the et file, does it emit a __et_list reference? sorry, confused. "the et_file ..." -- which file in the imapd distro? Otherwise, you have some other compile_et being used. Get rid of it. "There can be only one ..

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: % make depend % make all fails @: ... sievec.c gcc -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/usr/local/berkeley-db/lib -bind_at_load -ldl -L/usr/local/berkeley-db/lib -ldb -F/Library/Frameworks -framework SASL2 -o sievec sievec.o libsieve.a ../lib/libcyrus

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

hi derrick, thx for the reply =) On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: -L/usr/local/berkeley-db/lib -ldb-4.3 -lssl -lcrypto /usr/lib/libcom_err.a powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.0: /usr/lib/libcom_err.a: No such file or directory I assume they provide /usr/lib/libcom_err.dylib.

Re: et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

On Mon, 23 May 2005, OpenMacNews wrote: -L/usr/local/DarkMatter/berkeley-db/lib -ldb-4.3 -lssl -lcrypto /usr/lib/libcom_err.a powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.0: /usr/lib/libcom_err.a: No such file or directory I assume they provide /usr/lib/libcom_err.dylib. Edit the makefile to refer

et_list & com-err vs imapd v2.2.12 on OSX 10.4.1

derrick, fwiw, i'm seeing et_list-related errors as well, but on OSX 10.4.1 `initialize_imap_error_table_r': /usr/local/warez/cyrus-imapd-2.2.10/imap/imap_err.c:68: undefined reference to `initialize_error_table_r' libimap.a(imap_err.o)(.text+0x14):/usr/local/warez/cyrus-imapd-2.2.10/imap/i map