Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:48:50 -0500
From: "David L. Parsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
I remember people saying bare newlines violated RFC's, but shouldn't
cyrus be as lenient as possible in what it accepts, and as compliant as
possible in what it sends/produces?
The authors of
"David L. Parsley" wrote:
>
> I've tried to dig through the archives a few times, but haven't found
> good info on the problems people were having with 'message contains bare
> newlines'. I get several of these a week from the linux kernel mailing
> list.
>
> Messages like this get abandoned
I've tried to dig through the archives a few times, but haven't found
good info on the problems people were having with 'message contains bare
newlines'. I get several of these a week from the linux kernel mailing
list.
Messages like this get abandoned in /var/spool/mqueue; i.e., 'mailq'
doesn't
From: "John Holman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:57:03 -
> I've thrown a tarball containing cyrus imapd 1.6.25 at
>
> ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/BETA/cyrus-imapd-1.6.25.tar.gz
>
> If no one has any (serious) complai
John Holman wrote:
>
> > I've thrown a tarball containing cyrus imapd 1.6.25 at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/BETA/cyrus-imapd-1.6.25.tar.gz
> >
> > If no one has any (serious) complaints in the next two days, I'll move
> > this file up one level and announce it widely.
>
> I
> I've thrown a tarball containing cyrus imapd 1.6.25 at
>
> ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/BETA/cyrus-imapd-1.6.25.tar.gz
>
> If no one has any (serious) complaints in the next two days, I'll move
> this file up one level and announce it widely.
I can't find any such announcement - what
I've thrown a tarball containing cyrus imapd 1.6.25 at
ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/BETA/cyrus-imapd-1.6.25.tar.gz
If no one has any (serious) complaints in the next two days, I'll move
this file up one level and announce it widely. Please give it a test
run; most of my effort lately
