On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 14:39, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
>
> > 'virtual folders' ? I've never heard of such with Cyrus :)
>
> It'd just mean that executing an APPEND into them causes something
> "special" to happen rather than moving the message.
This makes
On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 14:32, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
>
> > I would be interested to hear more about the spam/ham training folders.
> > How do you (or others) keep users from deleting them, for example? It
> > seems a per-user folder solution would be the m
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
> This makes good sense when you consider the situation of a false
> positive.
>
> 1) user gets ham that was tagged as spam
> 2) user trains dspam by dropping the email into the is-no-spam folder
>
> In step 2 you don't want the message really moved.
>
> I
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
> 'virtual folders' ? I've never heard of such with Cyrus :)
It'd just mean that executing an APPEND into them causes something
"special" to happen rather than moving the message.
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
> I would be interested to hear more about the spam/ham training folders.
> How do you (or others) keep users from deleting them, for example? It
> seems a per-user folder solution would be the most intuitive, for both
> the user and the client interface.
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 23:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
>
> > I'm looking at setting up a DSPAM + Postfix + Cyrus solution here as
> > well. I have to wonder about the advantages of setting up a shared spam
> > folder for the system though.
>
> Oh, not th
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
> I'm looking at setting up a DSPAM + Postfix + Cyrus solution here as
> well. I have to wonder about the advantages of setting up a shared spam
> folder for the system though.
Oh, not that it really matters, but we're using Postfix + amavisd-new
to call
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
> Would it really have any serious advantage over forwarding the false
> negatives/positives to an email address for processing?
At this point I would say "yes". It's been hell trying to get folks
to forward the spam with the headers intact. Seems like ev
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 21:39, Scott Russell wrote:
> Would it really have any serious advantage over forwarding the false
> negatives/positives to an email address for processing?
Users. I have a hard time getting my users to wrap their heads around
the concept of a "spam" folder vs "trash" folder
We used to use bogofilter with the old pop3 system and with cyrus imapd
now we don't have any spam filter so far except the one built into mozilla.
A key question to me is if it is a good idea to share a single spam/ham
keyword database or to have one for every user. This is a bit OT - sorry
b
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Scott Russell wrote:
> well. I have to wonder about the advantages of setting up a shared spam
> folder for the system though.
It doesn't need to be shared -- it can be a per-user mailbox just as
easily.
> Would it really have any serious advantage over forwarding the false
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 09:22, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Robin M. wrote:
>
> > I have also been considering setting this up. I was thinking of having a
> > globally shared mailbox which users can 'drag' spam into. The dragging
> > could also be a 'report as spam', or 'this is not
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Robin M. wrote:
> I have also been considering setting this up. I was thinking of having a
> globally shared mailbox which users can 'drag' spam into. The dragging
> could also be a 'report as spam', or 'this is not spam' button. I was
> thinking of making the accss lists on t
Craig Ringer wrote:
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 23:26, Robin M. wrote:
I have also been considering setting this up. I was thinking of having a
globally shared mailbox which users can 'drag' spam into. The dragging
could also be a 'report as spam', or 'this is not spam' button. I was
thinking of making t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin M. wrote:
| On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
|
|
|>On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 20:58, Ghislain ADNET wrote:
|>
|>
|>>Or perhaps can i feed it directly from the actual
|>>individual files in the mailbox ?
|>
|>There are a couple of other things I
Robin M. wrote:
I have also been considering setting this up. I was thinking of having a
globally shared mailbox which users can 'drag' spam into. The dragging
could also be a 'report as spam', or 'this is not spam' button.
Wouldn't it be nice if there was a sieve extension that fed messages
into
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Dwight Tovey wrote:
> Robin M. said:
>
> >
> > Are there other people out there that have implemented this and what are
> > your methods ?
>
> I have a cron script that gets kicked off every night. It runs sa-learn
> on several cyrus folders, then turns around and runs 'ipurg
Robin M. said:
>
> Are there other people out there that have implemented this and what are
> your methods ?
I have a cron script that gets kicked off every night. It runs sa-learn
on several cyrus folders, then turns around and runs 'ipurge' on the ones
that need it. So, you could have someth
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 23:26, Robin M. wrote:
> I have also been considering setting this up. I was thinking of having a
> globally shared mailbox which users can 'drag' spam into. The dragging
> could also be a 'report as spam', or 'this is not spam' button. I was
> thinking of making the accss li
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 20:58, Ghislain ADNET wrote:
>
> > Or perhaps can i feed it directly from the actual
> > individual files in the mailbox ?
>
> There are a couple of other things I should mention about this approach.
> First: do not move or modify th
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 20:58, Ghislain ADNET wrote:
> Or perhaps can i feed it directly from the actual
> individual files in the mailbox ?
There are a couple of other things I should mention about this approach.
First: do not move or modify the files, only use IMAP to do that.
Otherwise you'll n
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 20:58, Ghislain ADNET wrote:
> To train the bayes filter of spamassassin you need to feed it the spam
> and "ham" so it learn how to deal with it.
> It can learn email from an mbox unix file. Now you can see the problem
> with cyrus as it does not use mbox format at all :
Hi,
The spam is still something that plagues us and so i installed a
spamassassin milter in my sendmail that stand before
the cyrus imap server. My problem is the end user bayes training. I need
the user to put spam in a special folder so it will train their bayes
databases.
To train the ba
23 matches
Mail list logo
