On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:16 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 02:55 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> > John Madden wrote:
> >
> > > It's well worth your time to maintain your own compiles and even
> >
> > > packages of Cyrus because the package maintainers can't keep up.
John Madden wrote:
> > Stating as if it were fact packagers are not able to keep up is somewhat
> > of a faux pas, and seriously frowned upon by yours sincerely.
>
> It's not that you can't keep up, it's that you don't keep up. The
> reasons behind the lag are usually quite understandable, but re
> Stating as if it were fact packagers are not able to keep up is somewhat
> of a faux pas, and seriously frowned upon by yours sincerely.
It's not that you can't keep up, it's that you don't keep up. The
reasons behind the lag are usually quite understandable, but regardless,
those who need th
On 09/06/2011 02:55 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
John Madden wrote:
> It's well worth your time to maintain your own compiles and even
> packages of Cyrus because the package maintainers can't keep up.
>
Stating as if it were fact packagers are not able to keep up is
somew
John Madden wrote:
> It's well worth your time to maintain your own compiles and even
> packages of Cyrus because the package maintainers can't keep up.
>
Stating as if it were fact packagers are not able to keep up is somewhat of a
faux pas, and seriously frowned upon by yours sincerely.
Kind
On 9/1/11 9:54 PM, Maria McKinley wrote:
> On 9/1/11 5:28 PM, Dan White wrote:
>> On 01/09/11 15:25 -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
>>> On 9/1/11 11:49 AM, Dan White wrote:
Do you use any group ACLs? It looks like your imapd process may be
waiting
for a group list enumeration to complet
On 9/1/11 5:28 PM, Dan White wrote:
> On 01/09/11 15:25 -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
>> On 9/1/11 11:49 AM, Dan White wrote:
>>> Do you use any group ACLs? It looks like your imapd process may be
>>> waiting
>>> for a group list enumeration to complete, via an nss ldap plugin.
>>>
>>> If so, and yo
On 01/09/11 15:25 -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
>On 9/1/11 11:49 AM, Dan White wrote:
>>Do you use any group ACLs? It looks like your imapd process may be waiting
>>for a group list enumeration to complete, via an nss ldap plugin.
>>
>>If so, and you are using the default 'auth_mech: unix' group aut
On 9/1/11 11:49 AM, Dan White wrote:
> On 01/09/11 10:14 -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
>>> On 8/31/11 1:09 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Ok - next time it goes crazy can you pick one up with gdb and get
a backtrace?
gdb $cyrusbinpath/imapd $pid
and then when you get the prom
On 01/09/11 10:14 -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
>> On 8/31/11 1:09 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>> Ok - next time it goes crazy can you pick one up with gdb and get
>>> a backtrace?
>>>
>>> gdb $cyrusbinpath/imapd $pid
>>>
>>> and then when you get the prompt:
>>>
>>> bt
>>>
>>> and maybe also:
>>>
>>>
On 8/31/11 1:40 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:51:03AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
>> On 8/31/11 11:44 AM, Wesley Craig wrote:
>>> On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote:
Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big:
PID USER
On 9/1/11 9:38 AM, Maria McKinley wrote:
> On 8/31/11 1:09 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
>>
>> Ok - next time it goes crazy can you pick one up with gdb and get
>> a backtrace?
>>
>> gdb $cyrusbinpath/imapd $pid
>>
>> and then when you get the prompt:
>>
>> bt
>>
>> and maybe also:
>>
>> p imapd_in
>>
On 8/31/11 1:09 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> Ok - next time it goes crazy can you pick one up with gdb and get
> a backtrace?
>
> gdb $cyrusbinpath/imapd $pid
>
> and then when you get the prompt:
>
> bt
>
> and maybe also:
>
> p imapd_in
>
> which will give us the command that's running.
>
> Ther
Hi,
Craig White schrieb am 01.09.2011 15:44 Uhr:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:34 -0400, John Madden wrote:
So annoying that the stable release of debian isn't supported
anymore. It seems like if you wait so long to release the stable
version that it isn't supported anymore, it sort of
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:34 -0400, John Madden wrote:
> >> So annoying that the stable release of debian isn't supported
> >> anymore. It seems like if you wait so long to release the stable
> >> version that it isn't supported anymore, it sort of defeats the
> >> purpose.
> >
> > Debian have been
On 31/08/11 22:40 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:51:03AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
>> On 8/31/11 11:44 AM, Wesley Craig wrote:
>> > On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote:
>> >> Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big:
>> >>
>> >>PID
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:51:03AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
> On 8/31/11 11:44 AM, Wesley Craig wrote:
> > On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote:
> >> Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big:
> >>
> >>PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIM
>> So annoying that the stable release of debian isn't supported
>> anymore. It seems like if you wait so long to release the stable
>> version that it isn't supported anymore, it sort of defeats the
>> purpose.
>
> Debian have been staying at 2.2 rather than moving up to 2.3 through
> two stable r
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:36:44AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
> On 8/31/11 10:56 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:33:14AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
> >>Hi there,
> >>
> >>I am having an issue with cyrus processes growing to use all of my cpus,
> >>at which point I have to
On 8/31/11 11:44 AM, Wesley Craig wrote:
> On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote:
>> Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big:
>>
>>PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
>>
>> 24328 cyrus 20 0 147m 6236 5004 R 27.4 0.2 22:0
On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote:
> Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
>
> 24328 cyrus 20 0 147m 6236 5004 R 27.4 0.2 22:07.21 imapd
>
> 27549 cyrus 20 0 147m
On 8/31/11 10:56 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:33:14AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I am having an issue with cyrus processes growing to use all of my cpus,
>> at which point I have to restart cyrus, because all other services on my
>> mail server grind to
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:33:14AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am having an issue with cyrus processes growing to use all of my cpus,
> at which point I have to restart cyrus, because all other services on my
> mail server grind to a halt. Below is my config file. Any ideas wh
Hi there,
I am having an issue with cyrus processes growing to use all of my cpus,
at which point I have to restart cyrus, because all other services on my
mail server grind to a halt. Below is my config file. Any ideas what may
be causing this? I noticed this behavior after the last cyrus upda
24 matches
Mail list logo
