Re: Virtual Domains and authentication

2003-08-14 Thread Simon Matter
> On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 11:47, Michael Fair wrote: >> I've never used pam for virtual domains but the general idea >> is that the user provides the fully qualified [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> as their userid. SASL splits that up into a "realm" and a >> user so in terms of SASL, creating the user looks so

Re: Virtual Domains and authentication

2003-08-14 Thread Andrew Koros
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 11:47, Michael Fair wrote: > I've never used pam for virtual domains but the general idea > is that the user provides the fully qualified [EMAIL PROTECTED] > as their userid. SASL splits that up into a "realm" and a > user so in terms of SASL, creating the user looks somethin

Re: Virtual Domains and authentication

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Fair
I've never used pam for virtual domains but the general idea is that the user provides the fully qualified [EMAIL PROTECTED] as their userid. SASL splits that up into a "realm" and a user so in terms of SASL, creating the user looks something like this: saslpasswd -c -U domain.dom userid I really

Re: Virtual Domains and authentication

2003-08-12 Thread Andrew Koros
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 14:18, Simon Matter wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 11:47, Michael Fair wrote: > >> I've never used pam for virtual domains but the general idea > >> is that the user provides the fully qualified [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> as their userid. SASL splits that up into a "realm" and

Virtual Domains and authentication

2003-08-03 Thread James Satterfield
I'm having a lot of difficulty wrapping my mind around authentication for a virtual domain configuration. I would like to use PAM for auth, but I don't see how to get around the '@' in the usernames. I see nothing in the docs that address how to setup auth for virtual domain support. Do any of you