Walter Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 2.0.7 is pretty stable. The CVS version fixes a couple of little bugs. If
>
> does anybody know when to expect the release of 2.0.8 (or whatever it
> will be)?
Very soon (probably within a week). If anyone is holding on to any
patches, now would b
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Walter Steiner wrote:
>
> > > 2.0.7 is pretty stable. The CVS version fixes a couple of little bugs.
If
> >
> > does anybody know when to expect the release of 2.0.8 (or whatever it
> > will be)? We are running 2.0.7 on our test server for 3 months a
Walter Steiner wrote:
> > 2.0.7 is pretty stable. The CVS version fixes a couple of little bugs.
If
>
> does anybody know when to expect the release of 2.0.8 (or whatever it
> will be)?
I guess it'll be whenever Lawrence gets around to it ;-)
> We are running 2.0.7 on our test server for 3 month
> 2.0.7 is pretty stable. The CVS version fixes a couple of little bugs. If
does anybody know when to expect the release of 2.0.8 (or whatever it
will be)? We are running 2.0.7 on our test server for 3 months and we
are about to switch our production server to cyrus before the end of
the year an
Cillian Sharkey wrote:
> Some time in the near future I will be converting a POP3 site over to IMAP
> using Cyrus. I plan on using Exim on the external mail host to deliver
> mail by LMTP over TCP to the internal imap server. Should I use 1.6.x
> or 2.0.x? If 2.0.x is just as stable as 1.6.x, then
Hi Folks,
Some time in the near future I will be converting a POP3 site over to IMAP
using Cyrus. I plan on using Exim on the external mail host to deliver
mail by LMTP over TCP to the internal imap server. Should I use 1.6.x
or 2.0.x? If 2.0.x is just as stable as 1.6.x, then I will use it.
Is
