On 21/01/11 14:53, Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
>> Out of interest, what are the objections to the current patch? And would
>> it be applied to the 2.4.x series or wait until 2.5?
>>
> A (commonly) bad MTA configuration that not reject unknown recipients,
> and try to deliver the message to cyrus w
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland
> wrote:
>> On 20/01/11 18:53, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>>
I hope this is useful for those who want to upgrade to 2.4 and can't
wait
until the auto* feature is implemented upstream - Bron, thanks for
looking
into it _after_
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland
wrote:
> On 20/01/11 18:53, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
>>> I hope this is useful for those who want to upgrade to 2.4 and can't wait
>>> until the auto* feature is implemented upstream - Bron, thanks for looking
>>> into it _after_ moving your home an
On 20/01/11 18:53, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> I hope this is useful for those who want to upgrade to 2.4 and can't wait
>> until the auto* feature is implemented upstream - Bron, thanks for looking
>> into it _after_ moving your home and what else :)
>
> :)
FWIW us at Sirius are very interested in t
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 02:36:02PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
> I've just released an updated cyrus-imapd-2.4.6-3 RPM which includes
> updated autocreate/autosievefolder patches from here
> http://www.vx.sk/download/patches/cyrus-imapd/
> I hope this is useful for those who want to upgrade to 2.4 a
I've just released an updated cyrus-imapd-2.4.6-3 RPM which includes
updated autocreate/autosievefolder patches from here
http://www.vx.sk/download/patches/cyrus-imapd/
I hope this is useful for those who want to upgrade to 2.4 and can't wait
until the auto* feature is implemented upstream - Bron,