On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> (This is a re-posted message from our development mailing list.)
>
> In our IRC channel, it was suggested to look at RFC 2821, section 2.4, quoted
> as saying:
>
> "However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox lo
André Schild wrote:
> @bücher.ch is allowed.
> In dns this is represented as a IDN encoded name in the form of***
>
> xn--bcher-kva.ch* is the ACE string, and it is this string that is
> entered in the DNS.
>
Fine, let me rephrase;
The IDN<->ACE string conversion, while ASCII-only not being a
Am 11.02.2011 15:06, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems):
André Schild wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems):
> > Long story short; the proposal is to ship with a default
> > lmtp_downcase_rcpt of 1.
>
> Sound OK for me.
>
> When chan
André Schild wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems):
> > Long story short; the proposal is to ship with a default
> > lmtp_downcase_rcpt of 1.
>
> Sound OK for me.
>
> When chaning upper/lowercases we always have to consider character sets.
> For the
Hello,
Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems):
Hi there,
(This is a re-posted message from our development mailing list.)
In our IRC channel, it was suggested to look at RFC 2821, section 2.4,
quoted as saying:
"However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox l
Hi there,
(This is a re-posted message from our development mailing list.)
In our IRC channel, it was suggested to look at RFC 2821, section 2.4, quoted
as saying:
"However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox local-parts impedes
interoperability and is discouraged."
The problem state