Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-14 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > Hi there, > > (This is a re-posted message from our development mailing list.) > > In our IRC channel, it was suggested to look at RFC 2821, section 2.4, quoted > as saying: > > "However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox lo

Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
André Schild wrote: > @bücher.ch is allowed. > In dns this is represented as a IDN encoded name in the form of*** > > xn--bcher-kva.ch* is the ACE string, and it is this string that is > entered in the DNS. > Fine, let me rephrase; The IDN<->ACE string conversion, while ASCII-only not being a

Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread André Schild
Am 11.02.2011 15:06, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems): André Schild wrote: > Hello, > > Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems): > > Long story short; the proposal is to ship with a default > > lmtp_downcase_rcpt of 1. > > Sound OK for me. > > When chan

Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
André Schild wrote: > Hello, > > Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems): > > Long story short; the proposal is to ship with a default > > lmtp_downcase_rcpt of 1. > > Sound OK for me. > > When chaning upper/lowercases we always have to consider character sets. > For the

Re: Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread André Schild
Hello, Am 11.02.2011 14:11, schrieb Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems): Hi there, (This is a re-posted message from our development mailing list.) In our IRC channel, it was suggested to look at RFC 2821, section 2.4, quoted as saying: "However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox l

Tuning some defaults for 2.5: lmtp_downcase_rcpt

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
Hi there, (This is a re-posted message from our development mailing list.) In our IRC channel, it was suggested to look at RFC 2821, section 2.4, quoted as saying: "However, exploiting the case sensitivity of mailbox local-parts impedes interoperability and is discouraged." The problem state