Re: Sourceforge (was Re: Cyrus documentation)

2001-08-14 Thread Norbert Klasen
--On Sonntag, 12. August 2001 14:59 +0200 Tarjei Huse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Q 2. Death by 11 nr II > "Ok the db's are ok. still I am having problems". > You are using pam-ldap & openldap 2.0.x for authentication, right? > > Ok. Bad idea. The reason is that OL2 also uses the sasl libs. Th

Re: Sourceforge (was Re: Cyrus documentation)

2001-08-10 Thread Jeremy Howard
Amos Gouaux wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:49:11 +1000, > > Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jh) writes: > > jh> I think it would add lots. Not just for a documentation project, but for the > jh> whole Cyrus project. It would make it more of a community project rather > jh> than a CMU

Re: Sourceforge (was Re: Cyrus documentation)

2001-08-09 Thread Amos Gouaux
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:49:11 +1000, > Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (jh) writes: jh> I think it would add lots. Not just for a documentation project, but for the jh> whole Cyrus project. It would make it more of a community project rather jh> than a CMU project, which means more peo

Re: Sourceforge (was Re: Cyrus documentation)

2001-08-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Jeremy Howard wrote: > If you moved across to SourceForge you get web-based CVS browsing (really > handy for developers getting involved the first time) and web-based list > archives that work (the current horde-based archive is slow as molasses, and > the IMAP-based archive

Sourceforge (was Re: Cyrus documentation)

2001-08-09 Thread Jeremy Howard
Walter Wong wrote: > Part of the problem is that people are distributing binaries without > the source code and all the docs are in the doc/ subdir of the source > distribution. > Partly. And partly the docs don't provide a great beginners overview of everything you need to know, but are more usef