Re: Simple Sieve question

2008-07-06 Thread Jan Schneider
Though it's usually: fileinto "user.fred.Spam" Zitat von Scott Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Assuming that user has the 'p' right to user.fred.INBOX.Spam then yes. > If they don't have the 'p' right, the mail will just be sent in limbo. > On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Bob Bob wrote: > Hi

Fwd: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question

2008-07-05 Thread Scott Likens
another ... Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: July 5, 2008 3:32:02 AM PDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fwd: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question Dear Business Partner, for months the mails of our user have been sent to you from our new Domain. This Domain has now been

Fwd: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question

2008-07-05 Thread Scott Likens
If someone can please remove this user from the mailing lists? Thanks :) Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: July 4, 2008 3:54:47 PM PDT To: "Scott Likens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: NDN: Re: Simple Sieve question Sorry. Your message could not

Re: Simple Sieve question

2008-07-04 Thread Scott Likens
Assuming that user has the 'p' right to user.fred.INBOX.Spam then yes. If they don't have the 'p' right, the mail will just be sent in limbo. On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:30 AM, Bob Bob wrote: Hi all Cant seem to find an answer on this one.. I should experiment but would like some advance info. C

Simple Sieve question

2008-07-04 Thread Bob Bob
Hi all Cant seem to find an answer on this one.. I should experiment but would like some advance info. Can sieve "fileinto" into a mailbox folder that is not at or below the Inbox?. If so what would the syntax look like; ie fileinto "/user.fred.INBOX.Spam" instead of just "INBOX.Spam" as us

Re: Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Andrew Morgan
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > Hi, > > It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension > will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver > when vacation match ? > > Thanks ! You could add an explicit "discard;" after the vacation to do

Re: Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Etienne Goyer wrote: > It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension > will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver > when vacation match ? is: if test { vacation ...; discard; } what you mean? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Simple Sieve question (vacation)

2003-10-09 Thread Etienne Goyer
Hi, It is my understanding that message replied to by the vacation extension will still be delivered in the mailbox. Is it possible not to deliver when vacation match ? Thanks ! -- Etienne GoyerLinux Québec Technologies Inc. http://www.LinuxQuebec.com [EMAIL PROTECTED