Derrick J Brashear wrote:
[ ... ]
Something I will point out, procmail is more fully-featured than
sieve, mostly by design. procmail can do anything you could do if you
were logged into the machine and had a shell. sieve has limited powers.
So, it may not be possible to convert every procmail sc
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 00:04 -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
Nothing like following-up to your own posts.
The consensus of the private emails I've received is that some people
opt not to utilize Sieve, based upon the lack of documentation.
I find that surprising,
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Nothing like following-up to your own posts.
>
> The consensus of the private emails I've received is that some people
> opt not to utilize Sieve, based upon the lack of documentation.
One could start with reading RFC 3028, RFC 3431, RFC 3598,
draft-showalter-sieve-vac
On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 00:04 -0500, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Nothing like following-up to your own posts.
>
> The consensus of the private emails I've received is that some people
> opt not to utilize Sieve, based upon the lack of documentation.
>
> I find that surprising, but I've not found much
Nothing like following-up to your own posts.
The consensus of the private emails I've received is that some people
opt not to utilize Sieve, based upon the lack of documentation.
I find that surprising, but I've not found much to speak of yet -
anyone? Or do we just use procmail as the mailer
Hi there,
I'm still searching - however, are there any quick HOWTOs on correctly
setting up Sieve with Cyrus IMAP.
I have the IMAP server compiled (with Sieve support) - and now I'd like
to begin the task of converting my procmail scripts (which are simple,
thankfully) to Sieve and testing it o
