Alec H. Peterson wrote:
--On January 26, 2005 7:17:19 AM -0700 "Alec H. Peterson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice, that did it.
I noticed an interesting side effect of this patch. While it does
synchronize the database nicely for seen state changes, it unfortunately
does not also notify the i
--On January 26, 2005 7:17:19 AM -0700 "Alec H. Peterson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice, that did it.
I noticed an interesting side effect of this patch. While it does
synchronize the database nicely for seen state changes, it unfortunately
does not also notify the idled process of the datab
Nice, that did it.
Thanks!
Alec
--On January 26, 2005 9:02:16 AM + David Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Alec H. Peterson wrote:
Anyway, my question is this: Is there anything that can be done to
reliably propagate seen state changes across persistent IMAP sessions
open
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Alec H. Peterson wrote:
> Anyway, my question is this: Is there anything that can be done to
> reliably propagate seen state changes across persistent IMAP sessions
> open against the same mailbox?
Here's a patch that I suspect will do what you are looking for (its
agains
Hi there,
I am running Cyrus IMAP v2.2.10. I have a configuration where I sometimes
have persistent connections to the server opened from multiple clients to
the same mailbox. In this case, I am using the Mulberry desktop client and
the Chatter for Palm OS client (which implements IMAP IDLE su
