Re: SAN based storage

2006-04-19 Thread Ben Carter
Michael Loftis wrote: > > > --On April 19, 2006 12:47:26 PM -0500 John Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> We run cyrus on RedHat on a CX600. For our administrative users, we put >> the whole thing on a nine disk fibre channel RAIDgroup, split into 6 >> luns, 5 for mail spool partitions and 1

Re: SAN based storage

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Loftis
--On April 19, 2006 12:47:26 PM -0500 John Wade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We run cyrus on RedHat on a CX600. For our administrative users, we put the whole thing on a nine disk fibre channel RAIDgroup, split into 6 luns, 5 for mail spool partitions and 1 for all the other metadata. Total mai

Re: SAN based storage

2006-04-19 Thread John Wade
We run cyrus on RedHat on a CX600. For our administrative users, we put the whole thing on a nine disk fibre channel RAIDgroup, split into 6 luns, 5 for mail spool partitions and 1 for all the other metadata. Total mail spool size is 300GB. We average about 300 concurrent users. The CX600 is h

Re: SAN based storage

2006-04-19 Thread Michael Loftis
--On April 19, 2006 6:40:27 PM +0200 Andrzej Kwiatkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I'm going to build email-system based on cyrus with SAN storage. As an array i will use CX700. For every instance i'g going to build raid group from 9 146GB disks. I've noticed that in last version of i

SAN based storage

2006-04-19 Thread Andrzej Kwiatkowski
Hi I'm going to build email-system based on cyrus with SAN storage. As an array i will use CX700. For every instance i'g going to build raid group from 9 146GB disks. I've noticed that in last version of imapd is possibility to separate mail files and meta files. Does it make sense to seperate