Re : Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-05-16 Thread Julien Marchal
I have try Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 before i use Cyrus IMAP 1.6.22 (on solaris 2.6). We use only imap and pop with 20,000 users. I have put this in my cyrus.conf imap cmd="imapd" listen="imap" prefork=2 maxchild=30 pop3 cmd="pop3d" listen="pop3" prefork=2 But i don't understand how work the master p

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-30 Thread mills
Larry Greenfield writes: > >I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a >couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love >to have people try it out. I hear that my directory hashing patch didn't make it into this release. Will it be in the next one?

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-29 Thread Dori . Seliskar
Walter Wong wrote: > Speaking of Linux, did you do the chattr +S to make the disk writes > synchronous? If you are willing to lose data on a crash, you may want > to see if performance improves by changing that. If you aren't willing > to lose data on a crash, maybe you can see if resierfs perfor

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-28 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
Thank you for the answer. --- Walter Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Helmut Apfelholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > this is greate that the development of the server > is > > moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also > watch > > to mailing list, and have seen the 'forking > problem' that

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
I've had a problem that might be in under FBSD 3.5stable. I haven't implemented Cyrus yet, but under load testing I see a large number of sendmail processes that are in a "Client Greeting" state. I presume that sendmail is trying to talk to lmtpd and not getting a response. I've gotten around

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Walter Wong
Helmut Apfelholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this is greate that the development of the server is > moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch > to mailing list, and have seen the 'forking problem' that > ppl here have been describing. Yes, we read the mailing lists but have been bus

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Ken Murchison
"Larry M. Rosenbaum" wrote: > > >I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a > >couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love > >to have people try it out. > > I noticed that pop3d.c now has some APOP code. Does that mean > there's a new version

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread rj45
this forking problem is related only in the case of Linux environment ? I have not noticed it on FreeBSD. thanks Rick On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Helmut Apfelholz wrote: > Hi, > this is greate that the development of the server is > moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch > to > maili

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Larry M. Rosenbaum
>I've placed Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 on ftp.andrew. This version adds a >couple of new features and some slight code reorganization. We'd love >to have people try it out. I noticed that pop3d.c now has some APOP code. Does that mean there's a new version of Cyrus SASL containing the sasl_checkapop(

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Amos Gouaux
I was wondering if perhaps the "maxchild" parameter was inspired, at least in part, to keep a check on processes like lmtpd from getting so numerous that the possibility of contention increases. Though, that's just a wild guess > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 03:55:41 -0700 (PDT), > Helmut Apf

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-27 Thread Helmut Apfelholz
Hi, this is greate that the development of the server is moving along. I hope that you guys at cmu also watch to mailing list, and have seen the 'forking problem' that ppl here have been describing. We will try to test the newest release and will report ASAP if the problem persists or not. Thank

Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 released

2001-04-26 Thread Michael Fair
God I love these guys! Thanks Larry! Being part of the Cyrus crowd is great. I was just thinking about the fact that I hadn't seen any announcements about 2.0.13 just yesterday and was wondering if the coding was still coming along. -- Michael -- - Original Message - From: "Lawrence