RE: using skiplist for quotas.db

2007-01-19 Thread Ken Murchison
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Rob Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Sent: 1/19/07 9:42 AM Subject: Re: using skiplist for quotas.db On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 07:49 -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > Rob Mueller wrote: > > The problem I saw was that access

Re: using skiplist for quotas.db

2007-01-19 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 07:49 -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > Rob Mueller wrote: > > The problem I saw was that accessing a skiplist db involves locking the > > entire file I believe. This felt like a huge point of contention, > > especially since every email delivered would lock it. I never did end

Re: using skiplist for quotas.db

2007-01-19 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 21:58 +1100, Rob Mueller wrote: > What filesystem are you using? Have you considered trying reiserfs with > tails enabled. It's quite impressive how little disk space it actually uses > (don't believe du output). We used to use NVRAM cards, and even with 100,000 > users, it

Re: using skiplist for quotas.db

2007-01-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Mueller wrote: so I wonder, will skiplist be a better choice? obviously running quota(8) will be a very cheap operation, but I'm worried about contention on the quota database during delivery etc. (these users are for the most part not actively using the system -- they get less than one m

Re: using skiplist for quotas.db

2007-01-19 Thread Rob Mueller
so I wonder, will skiplist be a better choice? obviously running quota(8) will be a very cheap operation, but I'm worried about contention on the quota database during delivery etc. (these users are for the most part not actively using the system -- they get less than one message per day each(