Re: Usernames with "+" in it

That will likely prove to be far more trouble than it's worth. Both Cyrus and most Unix MTA's treat + as a seperator/extender, so info+example.com == info (but tells cyrus to try to file it into the example.com folder if permissions allow) It's certainly possible to login as that user, th

Re: Usernames type

Read the docs about unixhierarchysep option in imapd.conf. Using this option you can use "." in usernames. Bye Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote: Hello all again... I have another problem. In my company, the default unsernames to e-mail is .@domain, for example the user Richard Stallman is richard.stall

Re: Usernames type

On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 13:30 -0300, Lincoln Zuljewic Silva wrote: > how I can create the mailboxes in tha format . ? look for unixhiersep in man imapd.conf and in documentation. Ondrej -- Ondrej Sury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyr

Re: Usernames and imp-webmail.

help ! bye, Chris - Original Message - From: "Andrew Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Christiaan den Besten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 11:59 PM Subject: Re: Usernames and imp-webmail. On Mon, 18 Oct

Re: Usernames and imp-webmail.

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Christiaan den Besten wrote: > Hi all ! > > Our users are pretty much used to use imp for webmail. Unfortunately after > migrating to cyrus some have been scared like hell, all their email was > lost! Or so it seemed :) > > > # Forcing recipient user to lowercase > # Cy

Re: Usernames and imp-webmail.

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Christiaan den Besten wrote: Hi all ! Our users are pretty much used to use imp for webmail. Unfortunately after migrating to cyrus some have been scared like hell, all their email was lost! Or so it seemed :) # Forcing recipient user to lowercase # Cyrus 2.1 is case-se

Re: Usernames without alpha characters

> * Tore Anderson > > > Hi. I've run into problems with usernames like "123" or "1_1". > > What seems to be the common thing is that that none of them > > contains alphabetic characters. Cyradm creates them just fine > > (although they for some reason is created under the "q" directory >

Re: Usernames without alpha characters

* Simon Matter > I have no idea why this restriction exists but there is a patch > somewhere to make all numeric mailboxes possible. You're right. See . That was committed 12 hours ago. I

Re: Usernames without alpha characters

> * Tore Anderson > > > Hi. I've run into problems with usernames like "123" or "1_1". > > What seems to be the common thing is that that none of them > > contains alphabetic characters. Cyradm creates them just fine > > (although they for some reason is created under the "q" directory >

Re: Usernames without alpha characters

* Tore Anderson > Hi. I've run into problems with usernames like "123" or "1_1". > What seems to be the common thing is that that none of them > contains alphabetic characters. Cyradm creates them just fine > (although they for some reason is created under the "q" directory > when using

Re: Usernames without alpha characters

* Tore Anderson > Hi. I've run into problems with usernames like "123" or "1_1". > What seems to be the common thing is that that none of them > contains alphabetic characters. Cyradm creates them just fine > (although they for some reason is created under the "q" directory > when using

Re: Usernames without alpha characters

On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:16:23 +0200, Tore Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi. I've run into problems with usernames like "123" or "1_1". > What seems to be the common thing is that that none of them contains > alphabetic characters. Cyradm creates them just fine (although they > for

Re: usernames with an "@" symbol

Sorry... I didn't realize that you're using virtual domains. El mar, 10-02-2004 a las 20:01, Igor Brezac escribió: > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Alberto Tablado wrote: > > > The '@' it isn't a valid character for mail addresses. In addition, it > > splits local parts from domains. Certainly you'll ha

Re: usernames with an "@" symbol

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Alberto Tablado wrote: > The '@' it isn't a valid character for mail addresses. In addition, it > splits local parts from domains. Certainly you'll have problems facing > SMTP servers. Why? Email address is not the same as username, although their values can be the same. -

Re: usernames with an "@" symbol

The '@' it isn't a valid character for mail addresses. In addition, it splits local parts from domains. Certainly you'll have problems facing SMTP servers. El dom, 08 de 02 de 2004 a las 21:12, Robin M. escribió: > Sorry if this made it two times > > Hi I am trying to get usernames with an @ symb

Re: usernames with an "@" symbol

On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Igor Brezac wrote: > On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Robin M. wrote: > > > On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Igor Brezac wrote: > > > > > What does your saslauthd.conf look like? You probably need to set > > > 'ldap_filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'. cyrus-sasl 2.1.17 splits fully a qualified > > > usernam

Re: usernames with an "@" symbol

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Robin M. wrote: > On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Igor Brezac wrote: > > > What does your saslauthd.conf look like? You probably need to set > > 'ldap_filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'. cyrus-sasl 2.1.17 splits fully a qualified > > usernam > > to the user and realm portion before it is passe

Re: usernames with an "@" symbol

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Igor Brezac wrote: > What does your saslauthd.conf look like? You probably need to set > 'ldap_filter: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'. cyrus-sasl 2.1.17 splits fully a qualified usernam > to the user and realm portion before it is passed to saslauthd. > my /etc/saslauthd.conf was ldap_s

Re: usernames with an "@" symbol

On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Mike O'Rourke wrote: > >>> > >>> "Robin M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/08/04 09:12PM >>> > Sorry if this made it two times > > Hi I am trying to get usernames with an @ symbol to work properly. > > My postfix, saslauthd, and ldap all work properly. I used the Invoca >

Re: usernames with an "@" symbol

>>> >>> "Robin M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/08/04 09:12PM >>> Sorry if this made it two times Hi I am trying to get usernames with an @ symbol to work properly. My postfix, saslauthd, and ldap all work properly. I used the Invoca rpms of the 2.2.3 release. In my /etc/imapd.conf config

Re: usernames

On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 19:41, Luc de Louw wrote: > Hi! > > Do you know if its possible to have cyrus users like user@domain ? > If not, any suggestions? Yes. use lmtp patch at www.surf.org.uk (there are reasons not to do it though) -- Simon

Re: Usernames with dots in them

EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > Behalf Of Adam Fox > > > Sent: 18 April 2002 03:45 > > > To: David Fuchs > > > Cc: info-cyrus > > > Subject: Re: Usernames with dots in them > > > > > > > > > What version of the IMAP server is that under? I&

RE: Usernames with dots in them

]> wrote: > Version 2.1.3, though I have heard tale of a patch > for 2.0.16! > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Adam Fox > > Sent: 18 April 2002 03:45 > > To: David Fuchs > >

RE: Usernames with dots in them

Version 2.1.3, though I have heard tale of a patch for 2.0.16! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam Fox > Sent: 18 April 2002 03:45 > To: David Fuchs > Cc: info-cyrus > Subject: Re: Usernames with dots in them

Re: Usernames with dots in them

What version of the IMAP server is that under? I'm running 2.0.16 and I couldn't find any reference to that option under the imapd.conf man page. Thanks for the reply, Adam. David Fuchs wrote: > Look into the "unixhierarchysep" option in your imapd.conf - this will > allow you to use dots in