Re: thread=refs

2016-07-22 Thread Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus
Thanks for your help Gabriele Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon Da: Ken Murchison A: gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Data: 19 luglio 2016 18.00.28 CEST Oggetto:

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-19 Thread Ken Murchison via Info-cyrus
w.gabrielebulfon.com/> *Quantum Mechanics : *http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon *Da:* Ken Murchison *A:* gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu *Data:* 19 luglio 2016 15.02.36 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: thread=refs

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-19 Thread Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus
Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon Da: Ken Murchison A: gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Data: 19 luglio 2016 15.02.36 CEST Oggetto: Re: thread=refs I don't think much has

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-19 Thread Ken Murchison via Info-cyrus
bulfon.com <http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/> *Quantum Mechanics : *http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon *Da:* Ken Murchison *A:* gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu *Data:* 14 luglio 2016 17.14.18 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: th

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-18 Thread Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus
http://www.sonicle.com Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon Da: Ken Murchison A: gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Data: 14 luglio 2016 17.14.18 CEST Oggetto: Re: thread=refs I went ahead and committed an implementati

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-14 Thread Ken Murchison via Info-cyrus
m *Music: *http://www.gabrielebulfon.com *Quantum Mechanics : *http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon *Da:* Ken Murchison *A:* gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu *Data:* 8 luglio 2016 17.17.32 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: thread=ref

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-12 Thread Ken Murchison via Info-cyrus
ew.cmu.edu *Data:* 8 luglio 2016 17.17.32 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: thread=refs On 07/08/2016 11:08 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: Ok, sure, but still two issues remain other than the draft: - we need to get rid of subject grouping in REFS, it only brings disorder, merging stuff that is

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-08 Thread Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus
u.edu Data: 8 luglio 2016 17.17.32 CEST Oggetto: Re: thread=refs On 07/08/2016 11:08 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: Ok, sure, butstill two issues remain other than the draft: - we need to getrid of subject grouping in REFS, it only brings disorder,merging stuff that i

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-08 Thread Ken Murchison via Info-cyrus
brielebulfon *Da:* Ken Murchison *A:* gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu *Data:* 8 luglio 2016 16.39.17 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: thread=refs Is there an actual RFC? All I find is draft-ietf-morg-inthread-01. Looking at that dra

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-08 Thread Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus
CEST Oggetto: Re: thread=refs Is there an actual RFC? All I find is draft-ietf-morg-inthread-01. Looking at that draft, the only difference between REFS ad REFERENCES is this: THREAD=REFS sorts threads by the most recent INTERNALDATE in eachthread, replacing THREAD=REFERENCES step

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-08 Thread Ken Murchison via Info-cyrus
- *Da:* Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus *A:* Ken Murchison info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu *Data:* 8 luglio 2016 15.22.56 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: thread=refs Testing ;) and checking against a dovecot machine with refs and same mess

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-08 Thread Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus
://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon Da: Ken Murchison A: gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Data: 8 luglio 2016 15.02.38 CEST Oggetto: Re: thread=refs On 07/07/2016 02:03 PM, Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus wrote: I can finally getback to this after so many months! I

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-08 Thread Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus
://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon Da: Ken Murchison A: gbul...@sonicle.com info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Data: 8 luglio 2016 15.02.38 CEST Oggetto: Re: thread=refs On 07/07/2016 02:03 PM, Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus wrote: I can finally getback to this after so many months! I checked the

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-08 Thread Ken Murchison via Info-cyrus
---- *Da:* Ken Murchison *A:* info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu *Data:* 5 ottobre 2015 14.04.02 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: thread=refs As far as I can tell, the last specification for thread=refs was here:https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-morg-inthread-01 To implemen

Re: thread=refs

2016-07-07 Thread Gabriele Bulfon via Info-cyrus
refs - change the sortcrit to use the SORT_REVERSE modifier what do you think? may be fine? Sonicle S.r.l. : http://www.sonicle.com Music: http://www.gabrielebulfon.com Quantum Mechanics : http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/gabrielebulfon Da: Ken Murchison A: i

Re: thread=refs

2015-10-05 Thread Ken Murchison
riele *Da:* Ken Murchison *A:* info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu *Data:* 2 ottobre 2015 19.08.04 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: thread=refs On 10/02/2015 10:53 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: Nice, it's not a big deal for us to upgrade to new versions, surely easier than

Re: thread=refs

2015-10-05 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
Great, Ken. Can you give me some advice / pointer to the sources I should look at? Gabriele Da: Ken Murchison A: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Data: 2 ottobre 2015 19.08.04 CEST Oggetto: Re: thread=refs On 10/02/2015 10:53 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote: Nice, it's not a big deal for

Re: thread=refs

2015-10-02 Thread Ken Murchison
documented in 2010). *Da:* Bron Gondwana *A:* info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu *Data:* 2 ottobre 2015 12.59.08 CEST *Oggetto:* Re: thread=refs No, there isn't. The conversations work in 3.0 beta contains a lot of what would be required to efficiently imple

Re: thread=refs

2015-10-02 Thread Gabriele Bulfon
drew.cmu.edu Data: 2 ottobre 2015 12.59.08 CEST Oggetto: Re: thread=refs No, there isn't. The conversations work in 3.0 beta contains a lot of what would be required to efficiently implement THREAD=REFS, but nobody has done the work to implement it. It certainly will never be backported to the

Re: thread=refs

2015-10-02 Thread Bron Gondwana
No, there isn't.  The conversations work in 3.0 beta contains a lot of what would be required to efficiently implement THREAD=REFS, but nobody has done the work to implement it. It certainly will never be backported to the 2.4 series, which is only getting security updates and fixes for major bugs