Re: lmtp should give temporary failure for mailbox unknown

2006-10-16 Thread Ramprasad
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 10:23 +0200, Simon Matter wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 11:55 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > >> I have seen this behavior. It happens when a mail account exists in > >> authentication (ie mysql) but when the mailbox doesn't exist yet. > >> > >> Are you using autocreate inbox? I

Re: lmtp should give temporary failure for mailbox unknown

2006-10-13 Thread Simon Matter
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 11:55 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: >> I have seen this behavior. It happens when a mail account exists in >> authentication (ie mysql) but when the mailbox doesn't exist yet. >> >> Are you using autocreate inbox? If so, are you sure that the inbox >> exists for these mailboxes p

Re: lmtp should give temporary failure for mailbox unknown

2006-10-13 Thread Ramprasad
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 11:55 -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > I have seen this behavior. It happens when a mail account exists in > authentication (ie mysql) but when the mailbox doesn't exist yet. > > Are you using autocreate inbox? If so, are you sure that the inbox > exists for these mailboxes prior

Re: lmtp should give temporary failure for mailbox unknown

2006-10-12 Thread Jo Rhett
I have seen this behavior. It happens when a mail account exists in authentication (ie mysql) but when the mailbox doesn't exist yet. Are you using autocreate inbox? If so, are you sure that the inbox exists for these mailboxes prior to the message delivery? Or you could enable "createonpos

Re: lmtp should give temporary failure for mailbox unknown

2006-10-12 Thread Daniel Eckl
> Therefore we should concentrate on finding the real cause(s) of the > problem and try to solve them. Full acknowledge. That's why I wrote "until you have found the error". But in the meanwhile, Ram possibly does not want to loose mails. And it's easier to set a well documented option in postfix

Re: lmtp should give temporary failure for mailbox unknown

2006-10-12 Thread Farzad FARID
Hi, Daniel Eckl wrote: > Hmmm, well, a non existent mailbox is no temprary failure, it's very > permanent. okay, in this case it's a false error, but to make another > error to circumvent that is not a smooth solution. > > Perhaps you might want to set "soft_bounce = yes" in postfix' main.cf > unt

Re: lmtp should give temporary failure for mailbox unknown

2006-10-12 Thread Simon Matter
> Hmmm, well, a non existent mailbox is no temprary failure, it's very > permanent. okay, in this case it's a false error, but to make another > error to circumvent that is not a smooth solution. > > Perhaps you might want to set "soft_bounce = yes" in postfix' main.cf > until you have found the er

Re: lmtp should give temporary failure for mailbox unknown

2006-10-12 Thread Daniel Eckl
Hmmm, well, a non existent mailbox is no temprary failure, it's very permanent. okay, in this case it's a false error, but to make another error to circumvent that is not a smooth solution. Perhaps you might want to set "soft_bounce = yes" in postfix' main.cf until you have found the error. See: h