On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 21:24, Scott Russell wrote:
> I'm researching a postfix / amavisd-new / cyrus imapd solution myself.
> While you cannot have per-user ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs I thought you
> could have per user prefs defined in a mysql db. Am I not understanding
> amavisd-new correctly?
Y
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 19:37, Wil Cooley wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:00, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
> > I wan't user to be able to define individual criteria what is spam and
> > not just what should happen to emails considered as spam on an per user
> > basis.
>
> Just to clarify, with amavisd-ne
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:00, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
> thanks for the point, but I had also a look at this but as written in
> the docs the spam check is done once per message and not once per
> receipient. I'd like to have spammassassin called for each recepients as
> I want user give the ability to
Hi Kendrick
Kendrick Vargas said:
> Just wanted to chime in on this thread and note that this also answers
> Nick Fisher's question of why I do my setup (multiple instances of
> postfix) the way I do.
I don't have any knowledge on postfix. would the following example in your
setup have called t
Just wanted to chime in on this thread and note that this also answers
Nick Fisher's question of why I do my setup (multiple instances of
postfix) the way I do.
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
> Start Header!
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:24, James A. Pattie wrote:
> > Start Header!
> > --
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 04:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Romeo Benzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 21:41, Jure Pečar wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:53:13 +0100
> > > Romeo Benzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1. is my approach wide of the mark or are th
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 04:30, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Romeo Benzoni wrote:
> > 1. is my approach wide of the mark or are there better, smarter
> > solutions to achieve this? (I've read about people doing this using a
> > deliver wrapper which calls spamassassin and then deliver. but I don't
> > like
Quoting Romeo Benzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 21:41, Jure PeÄar wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:53:13 +0100
> > Romeo Benzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > 1. is my approach wide of the mark or are there better, smarter
> > > solutions to achieve this?
> >
> > Smarter
Romeo Benzoni wrote:
1. is my approach wide of the mark or are there better, smarter
solutions to achieve this? (I've read about people doing this using a
deliver wrapper which calls spamassassin and then deliver. but I don't
like this kind of "fork and exec orgies")
I'm in your situation - some o
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 21:41, Jure Pečar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:53:13 +0100
> Romeo Benzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1. is my approach wide of the mark or are there better, smarter
> > solutions to achieve this?
>
> Smarter solution: use amavisd-new, which can be fed via lmtp fro
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:53:13 +0100
Romeo Benzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. is my approach wide of the mark or are there better, smarter
> solutions to achieve this?
Smarter solution: use amavisd-new, which can be fed via lmtp from your MTA
and thus knows how to apply per user AV & SA setti
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:30, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
>
> > is there an RFC or a draft for this spam sieve? links?
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-daboo-sieve-spamtest-04.txt
thanks for the link.
do you know anyone already doing/done an imp
Start Header!
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:24, James A. Pattie wrote:
> Start Header!
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Rob Siemborski wrote:
> | On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
> |
> |
> |>So my specific questions are:
> |>
> |>1. is my approach wide of the mark or are t
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 15:59, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
>
> > So my specific questions are:
> >
> > 1. is my approach wide of the mark or are there better, smarter
> > solutions to achieve this? (I've read about people doing this using a
> > deliver wrapper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Siemborski wrote:
| On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
|
|
|>So my specific questions are:
|>
|>1. is my approach wide of the mark or are there better, smarter
|>solutions to achieve this? (I've read about people doing this using a
|>deliver
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
> is there an RFC or a draft for this spam sieve? links?
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-daboo-sieve-spamtest-04.txt
> I always thought, that paradigm on sieve was to keep it simple. Not like
> procmail which is very powerful but also very dest
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Romeo Benzoni wrote:
> So my specific questions are:
>
> 1. is my approach wide of the mark or are there better, smarter
> solutions to achieve this? (I've read about people doing this using a
> deliver wrapper which calls spamassassin and then deliver. but I don't
> like thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
