Re: idled multiplying and consuming the server

2016-06-16 Thread Wolfgang Breyha via Info-cyrus
Eugene M. Zheganin via Info-cyrus wrote on 10/06/16 16:58: > idled cmd="idled" listen="/var/imap/socket/idled" proto="udp" prefork=0 That looks like an entry in the SERVICE section. That's wrong for idled. idled should be added at the end of the START section like START { idled

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-15 Thread Robert Norris
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, at 09:09 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote: > I hope I got that right. The SMS/XMPP thing could be useful if it were > documented. I'm not sure I'm seeing the utility of the sievenotifier > setting (send an email to let you know an email has been sent?). Its useful if you want to notif

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-15 Thread Patrick Goetz
On 12/12/2014 05:00 PM, Robert Norris wrote: > On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 08:37 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote: >> What calendar is it that is using notifyd like this? > The notifyd described in that blog post is not the stock Cyrus notifyd, > but our own custom daemon that speaks the notifyd protocol. > Che

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014, at 12:22 PM, Robert Norris wrote: > On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 11:06 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> That said, I'm very tempted to push at least calalarmd back into >> cyrus-master for 2.5. You don't need to enable it if you don't >> want it. > > I think that's the right thing to d

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-12 Thread Robert Norris
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 11:06 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > That said, I'm very tempted to push at least calalarmd back into > cyrus-master for 2.5. You don't need to enable it if you don't > want it. I think that's the right thing to do. Alarms are pretty important and they're hard to implement out

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Robert Norris wrote: > On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 08:37 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote: >> What calendar is it that is using notifyd like this? > > The notifyd described in that blog post is not the stock Cyrus > notifyd, but our own custom daemon that speaks the notifyd p

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-12 Thread Robert Norris
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, at 08:37 AM, Patrick Goetz wrote: > What calendar is it that is using notifyd like this? The notifyd described in that blog post is not the stock Cyrus notifyd, but our own custom daemon that speaks the notifyd protocol. Cheers, Rob N. Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrus

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-12 Thread Patrick Goetz
On 12/12/2014 04:04 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > http://blog.fastmail.com/2014/12/02/dec-3-push-it-real-good/ > From this blog post: "We’ll talk about notifyd first, because it’s the simpler of the two. The two main styles of events it handles are calendar email notifications and Sieve (filter/ru

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-12 Thread Niels Dettenbach
Am Freitag, 12. Dezember 2014, 21:04:44 schrieb Bron Gondwana: > There's tons of interesting stuff you can do with notify in what will be 2.5 > > http://blog.fastmail.com/2014/12/02/dec-3-push-it-real-good/ ...long awaitet such features - really nice, so we still await the release of 2.5 when off

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-12 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014, at 08:28 PM, Niels Dettenbach wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014, 15:59:42 schrieb Patrick Goetz: > > Now that I'm going over the entire configuration in great detail, I find > > out that idled would be pretty useful thing to have running (since we > > use mostly the

Re: idled vs. notifyd ?

2014-12-12 Thread Niels Dettenbach
Am Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014, 15:59:42 schrieb Patrick Goetz: > Now that I'm going over the entire configuration in great detail, I find > out that idled would be pretty useful thing to have running (since we > use mostly the Thunderbird MUA, which supports IDLE), while I'm not even > sure w

Re: idled errors

2011-09-26 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 13:42 -0500, Dan White wrote: > On 26/09/11 15:21 +0200, Riccardo Veraldi wrote: > Is idled running as a process? Is it listening on > /var/lib/imap/socket/idle? Try: > netstat -l -p | grep You can check this with "fuser" as well, which is a bit more 'streamlined'. # fuser

Re: idled errors

2011-09-26 Thread Dan White
On 26/09/11 15:21 +0200, Riccardo Veraldi wrote: >Hello, >on the impd.log I have plenty of idled errors > >Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27607]: error sending to idled: 1 >Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27584]: error sending to idled: 1 >Sep 26 15:12:50 iride imaps[27583]: error sending to idled: 1 >Sep

Re: idled: unrecognized message: 3

2007-10-16 Thread Alain Spineux
Hi I dont uderstand your problem, but did you try to debug one "failing connection". You can log a full imap session using this way : To enable protocol logging, simply create a directory in /var/lib/imap/log with the user's name you wish to log. Ensure, of course, that this directory is writable

Re: idled: unrecognized message: 3

2007-10-15 Thread Ian G Batten
On 12 Oct 07, at 1901, Ian G Batten wrote: > I've just brought up our 2.3.9 installation. My logs are filled with > `idled: unrecognized message: 3', happening around the time of > login. Should I worry? Tracked that one down. In 2.2 you need --with-idle=idled. With 2.3 you need --enable-i

Re: idled vs poll

2006-10-20 Thread Adam Stephens
Scott Adkins wrote: cannot connect to saslauthd server: Connection refused Failed to connect to socket /var/cyrus/imap/socket/lmtp for local_cyrus_deliver transport: Connection refused error sending to idled: 0 The first thing I would do here is to use LMTP as a TCP socket instead of a

Re: idled vs poll

2006-10-18 Thread Scott Adkins
--On Wednesday, October 18, 2006 2:00 PM +0200 Sebastian Hagedorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On 18. Oktober 2006 11:25:09 +0100 Adam Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We deployed idled here over the summer on our main staff IMAP server, a Sunfire v480 running Solaris 8 and cyrus-imap 2.2.

Re: idled vs poll

2006-10-18 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On 18. Oktober 2006 11:25:09 +0100 Adam Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We deployed idled here over the summer on our main staff IMAP server, a Sunfire v480 running Solaris 8 and cyrus-imap 2.2.12. It typically has about 13,000 concurrent IMAP processes Wow, that's a lot of sessions! I'

Re: idled vs poll

2006-10-18 Thread Adam Stephens
Ken Murchison wrote: Jorey Bump wrote: Cyrus IMAP advertises IDLE, and the docs mention that the default method is "poll", but shed little light on the use of idled as an alternative. Which method is preferred, better performing (for users and/or servers), and more robust? idled will provi

Re: idled vs poll

2006-05-01 Thread Ken Murchison
Jorey Bump wrote: Cyrus IMAP advertises IDLE, and the docs mention that the default method is "poll", but shed little light on the use of idled as an alternative. Which method is preferred, better performing (for users and/or servers), and more robust? idled will provide the client with ins

Re: idled thoughts

2004-05-18 Thread +archive . info-cyrus
On Tue, 18 May 2004, Andreas wrote: > Is it useful? Does it use too much resources? Is it not used that much, > and as such not well tested? Haven't really noticed it taking up too much resources myself. In terms of it being useful, rather informal trial and error experimentation here seemed to

Re: IDLED doesn't notify

2003-02-17 Thread Ken Murchison
Jay Levitt wrote: > > I'm using Outlook Express 6 with Cyrus 2.1.12. When I send an e-mail to > myself, IDLED notifies the "user.jay.Sent Items" mailbox, but not the > "user.jay.Inbox" mailbox. I verified that there is an open, IDLEing IMAP > connection with Inbox SELECTed at the time. I trie

Re: idled

2002-12-04 Thread Ken Murchison
Gautam Das wrote: > > Which is better - using idled or polling? http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&msg=19191 -- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place 716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127 --PGP Public Key--