On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 02:40:48PM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:37 +0100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:51:38PM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > > open("/var/spool/imap/b/user/barnosky", O_RDONLY) = 12
> > I should say too - this is absolut
On 27.11.2011 19:59, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
>
> Indeed, and I can see that an earlier mmap for a file in the same
> directory succeeded. I'm sorry, but I have no idea why mmap is failing in
> this manner.
>
open("/var/spool/imap/b/user/barnosky", O_RDONLY) = 12
fstat64(12, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0700,
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:37 +0100, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:51:38PM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > open("/var/spool/imap/b/user/barnosky", O_RDONLY) = 12
> I should say too - this is absolutely a bug, please file
> a bug report and I'll get it fixed. But the workaro
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:51:38PM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> open("/var/spool/imap/b/user/barnosky", O_RDONLY) = 12
I should say too - this is absolutely a bug, please file
a bug report and I'll get it fixed. But the workaround
of finding the funny file and deleting/renaming it will
get
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:51:38PM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> open("/var/spool/imap/b/user/barnosky", O_RDONLY) = 12
Really?
That's the path you would get if you tried to parse a file
with UID 0, because the function that generates the filename
returns the directory if the UID is zero.
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 13:26 -0500, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:37 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:14 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> >> > I updated one of my production boxes to Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.12 [using
>> >> > Simon's excellent packa
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 13:26 -0500, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
> > On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:37 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:14 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> >> > I updated one of my production boxes to Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.12 [using
> >> > Simon's excellent packages]
>
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:37 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:14 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> > I updated one of my production boxes to Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.12 [using
>> > Simon's excellent packages]
>> > On my test box / replica I was able to reconstruct all the ma
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:37 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:14 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > I updated one of my production boxes to Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.12 [using
> > Simon's excellent packages]
> > On my test box / replica I was able to reconstruct all the mailboxe
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:14 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> I updated one of my production boxes to Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.12 [using
>> Simon's excellent packages]
>> On my test box / replica I was able to reconstruct all the mailboxes
>> But [of cou
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 12:14 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I updated one of my production boxes to Cyrus IMAPd 2.4.12 [using
> Simon's excellent packages]
> On my test box / replica I was able to reconstruct all the mailboxes
> But [of course] on the production box I have a few mailboxes [impo
11 matches
Mail list logo
