> Simon Matter wrote:
>
>>
>>Update:
>>Just found out they are also vanishing without running quota -f. Just
>>normal operation.
>
>Just to clarify, do you mean normal operation of the quota command (no
>-f option), or normal operation of the server?
I mean
Simon Matter wrote:
Update:
Just found out they are also vanishing without running quota -f. Just
normal operation.
Just to clarify, do you mean normal operation of the quota command (no
-f option), or normal operation of the server?
I mean normal operation of the server, no quota call involved.
T
> Simon Matter wrote:
>>>Simon Matter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Simon Matter wrote:
>>>
>>>
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Drafts/cyrus.header", O_RDWR)
=
4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Sent/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) =
4
q2:open("/v
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Drafts/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) =
4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Sent/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Trash/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) =
4
q2:open("/var/lib/imap/q
>> Simon Matter wrote:
>>> For the vanishing quota problem, it seems that the problem is from a
>>> bug
>>> in one of the patches I include in my rpms, not from cyrus-imapd
>>> itself.
>>> I'll provide more information after further investigation.
>>
>> So you're saying that current CVS works fine
> Simon Matter wrote:
>
>>>Jure Peèar wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
"Simon Matter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I had the same. Looks like somehow the information stored in the quota
>file was wrong and has been corrected. I didn't have this p
Simon Matter wrote:
Jure Peèar wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
"Simon Matter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had the same. Looks like somehow the information stored in the quota
file was wrong and has been corrected. I didn't have this problem again
with the patches 2.2.6 server.
I
> Jure Peèar wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
>> "Simon Matter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I had the same. Looks like somehow the information stored in the quota
>>>file was wrong and has been corrected. I didn't have this problem again
>>>with the patches 2.2.6 server.
Jure PeÃar wrote:
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
"Simon Matter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had the same. Looks like somehow the information stored in the quota
file was wrong and has been corrected. I didn't have this problem again
with the patches 2.2.6 server.
I'm saying that the qu
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 20:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
"Simon Matter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had the same. Looks like somehow the information stored in the quota
> file was wrong and has been corrected. I didn't have this problem again
> with the patches 2.2.6 server.
I'm saying that the quota file was
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:27:34 -0400
> Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I believe we have fixed both issues in CVS. You need to fetch the
>> latest lib/cyrusdb_quotalegacy.c and imap/quota.c
>
> I did that, placed both files in the fresh 2.2.6 tree and recompiled. Now
> i'm running qu
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:27:34 -0400
Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe we have fixed both issues in CVS. You need to fetch the
> latest lib/cyrusdb_quotalegacy.c and imap/quota.c
I did that, placed both files in the fresh 2.2.6 tree and recompiled. Now
i'm running quota -f -d
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Simon Matter wrote:
>
>> I mean normal operation of the server, no quota call involved.
>> The affected mailboxes are just randmon, it happens now and then and I
>> don't see anything in the logs (I don't have extensive logging enabled
>> on
>> this production server). It's re
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Simon Matter wrote:
time window on when one went missing a bit and then see if a delivery took
place or maybe the mailbox was expunged?
That's really difficult because there are usually around 200 - 500 imap
sessions running and the error happens for ~1 users quota / hour.
I'm c
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Simon Matter wrote:
I mean normal operation of the server, no quota call involved.
The affected mailboxes are just randmon, it happens now and then and I
don't see anything in the logs (I don't have extensive logging enabled on
this production server). It's really difficult to f
> Simon Matter wrote:
>
>Simon Matter wrote:
>
>>q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Drafts/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) =
>>4
>>q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Sent/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
>>q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Trash/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) =
>> 4
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Drafts/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) =
4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Sent/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Trash/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
q2:open("/var/lib/imap/quota/q/user.442vk", O_
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Drafts/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Sent/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Trash/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
q2:open("/var/lib/imap/quota/q/user.442vk", O_
>>> Simon Matter wrote:
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Drafts/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) =
4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Sent/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Trash/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
q2:open("/var/lib/imap/quota/q/user.4
>> Simon Matter wrote:
>>> q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Drafts/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
>>> q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Sent/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
>>> q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Trash/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
>>> q2:open("/var/lib/imap/quota/q/user.442vk", O_R
> Simon Matter wrote:
>> q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Drafts/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
>> q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Sent/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
>> q2:open("/var/spool/imap/q/user/442vk/Trash/cyrus.header", O_RDWR) = 4
>> q2:open("/var/lib/imap/quota/q/user.442vk", O_RDWR)
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
Do you still have the user folder with their emails?
I have seen this as well on 2.1.15, although not as frequently as your
seeing. We have about 800 users and every so often a client does not
have
any quota information when they view t
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Simon Matter wrote:
> Unfortunately something is really broken and it reminds me the bug in
> 2.2.4 in hash.c. There was also a fildescriptor leak which should be fixed
> in 2.2.6, which is what I'm running.
> Unfortunately I can't seem to find what's going on but I know that
> Simon Matter wrote:
>
>>>Simon Matter wrote:
>>>
>>>
>Do you still have the user folder with their emails?
>
>I have seen this as well on 2.1.15, although not as frequently as your
>seeing. We have about 800 users and every so often a client does not
>have
>any quota info
Simon Matter wrote:
Simon Matter wrote:
Do you still have the user folder with their emails?
I have seen this as well on 2.1.15, although not as frequently as your
seeing. We have about 800 users and every so often a client does not
have
any quota information when they view the account in our Cli
> Simon Matter wrote:
>
>>>Do you still have the user folder with their emails?
>>>
>>>I have seen this as well on 2.1.15, although not as frequently as your
>>>seeing. We have about 800 users and every so often a client does not
>>> have
>>>any quota information when they view the account in our
Simon Matter wrote:
Do you still have the user folder with their emails?
I have seen this as well on 2.1.15, although not as frequently as your
seeing. We have about 800 users and every so often a client does not have
any quota information when they view the account in our Client Interface.
When w
t have this problem until
recent 2.2.x versions.
>
> -Bob
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Matter
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 6:47 AM
>> To: Ken Murchison
>> Cc: [EMAI
on Matter
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 6:47 AM
> To: Ken Murchison
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Vanishing quota information
>
>
> > Simon Matter wrote:
> >
> >>>I have a new problem with vanishing quota. At least I didn't notice it
> &g
> Simon Matter wrote:
>
>>>I have a new problem with vanishing quota. At least I didn't notice it
>>>earlier. The situation is that we have quota for all users but suddenly
>>>quota for some users are lost, the user. file in the quota dir just
>>>doesn't exist anymore. We are using legacy_quota
Simon Matter wrote:
I have a new problem with vanishing quota. At least I didn't notice it
earlier. The situation is that we have quota for all users but suddenly
quota for some users are lost, the user. file in the quota dir just
doesn't exist anymore. We are using legacy_quota, so nothing new
> I have a new problem with vanishing quota. At least I didn't notice it
> earlier. The situation is that we have quota for all users but suddenly
> quota for some users are lost, the user. file in the quota dir just
> doesn't exist anymore. We are using legacy_quota, so nothing new here.
> Thi
32 matches
Mail list logo
