Thanks Nic that looks useful
Unfortunately ‘info' doesn’t seem to function on our installation:
localhost> lm shared/mbujobs
shared/mbujobs (\HasChildren)
localhost> lam shared/mbujobs
jt lrswipkxtecda
merlin lrs
anonymous p
ij lrswipkxtecda
localhost> info shared/mbujobs
localhost>
localhost>
On 03/18/2016 05:48 AM, Merlin Hartley via Info-cyrus wrote:
...
Of course, over-time more complexity is always required and I have
recently implemented a few shared mailboxes (rather than just sharing
user mailboxes).
Inevitably, the users are now asking for an auto-reply to be
configured for
We don't use shared mailboxes or non-user sieve at all at FastMail, so
it gets less testing than most things. I'd love to have contributions of
good test cases to Cassandane from someone who knows exactly how this
should work so we can make sieve good for the shared case too.
It's somewhat tricky
Sorry I wasn’t clear: we are using an alias with +plus addressing and lmtp to
deliver into the shared mailbox
I have the shared mailbox working just fine… it is only the sieve on shared
mailboxes that is failing...
aliases file:
mbujobs: +shared/mbujobs
exim router:
imap_shared_accept:
drive
I have had mixed luck with direct mailbox delivery(+ addressing) and
when I say mixed I mean mostly bad.
I wanted to try using it for direct delivery of copies of all sent messages.
I found I needed special permissions on all the mailboxes and duplicate
delivery detection would not work in that
Sieve is run as part of the mail delivery into the mailbox.
That would either be deliver or the lmtp interface.
If your users are dragging and dropping the messages into the shared
mailboxes then I don't believe that you can have sieve run on the mbox
to mbox transfer.
On 03/18/2016 06:48 AM
--On Monday, March 22, 2004 13:22:52 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 02:28, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> It also opens a world of possibility for new bugs. There definately isn't
> a consensus on what the desireable behavior here is.
User
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 02:28, Rob Siemborski wrote:
>
> > It also opens a world of possibility for new bugs. There definately isn't
> > a consensus on what the desireable behavior here is.
>
> User-created sieve loops strike me as one "fun" possibility to
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 02:28, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> It also opens a world of possibility for new bugs. There definately isn't
> a consensus on what the desireable behavior here is.
User-created sieve loops strike me as one "fun" possibility to be
avoided at all costs.
Craig Ringer
---
Home Pa
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Craig Ringer wrote:
> User-created sieve loops strike me as one "fun" possibility to be
> avoided at all costs.
Well, ok, there's a consensus on *that*.
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Stephen Grier wrote:
> Isn't it the case that for user-space mailboxes, sieve scripts are only
> applied on delivery via LMTP, and not when a message is copied or
> fileintod it? I don't see why the same behaviour wouldn't be adequate
> for shared mailboxes.
It isn't quite th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Stephen Grier wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:09, Ken Murchison wrote:
The biggest issue with sieve opn shared folders is how to use them. Are
they only executed when mail is delivered via LMTP, or are they executed
any time a message is inserted in
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Stephen Grier wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:09, Ken Murchison wrote:
> > The biggest issue with sieve opn shared folders is how to use them. Are
> > they only executed when mail is delivered via LMTP, or are they executed
> > any time a message is inserted into the mailbo
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:09, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Stephen Grier wrote:
>
> > What is the current situation with Sieve for shared mailboxes? I've read
> > the discussion from last July on the cyrus-devel list, subject
> > "[PROPOSAL] Sieve for shared mailboxes", but I can't find any anything
> >
Stephen Grier wrote:
What is the current situation with Sieve for shared mailboxes? I've read
the discussion from last July on the cyrus-devel list, subject
"[PROPOSAL] Sieve for shared mailboxes", but I can't find any anything
on the subject more recent than this.
Is it still the intention to use
15 matches
Mail list logo
