Re: sieve question: archive script

2009-10-28 Thread Greg A. Woods
At Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:51:45 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: Subject: Re: sieve question: archive script > > Bron Gondwana wrote: > > Sieve only runs during the LMTP phase. It doesn't move messages. > > > > I'd say go Perl + IMAP. It's pretty easy. > >

Re: Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Frederik Vervaet wrote: Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few) release(s) ? Its not tremendously likely, no. Adding sieve extensions makes the code worse and worse the more we add. Given the propensity of sieve extensions to never get "locked"

Re: Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Ken Murchison
Frederik Vervaet wrote: On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ken Murchison wrote: Frederik Vervaet wrote: Any pointers ? There are some drafts of Sieve extensions for tweaking headers, but Cyrus doesn't support any of them yet. Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few) release(s) ? I

Re: Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Frederik Vervaet
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ken Murchison wrote: Frederik Vervaet wrote: Any pointers ? There are some drafts of Sieve extensions for tweaking headers, but Cyrus doesn't support any of them yet. Is there any chance these extensions will be added in the next (few) release(s) ? -- Frederik Vervaet --- C

Re: Sieve question.

2004-05-25 Thread Ken Murchison
Frederik Vervaet wrote: I'm looking into adding some filtering to my postfix/cyrus server. I allready got sieve working nicely but i was wondering if sieve supports some actions i'm used to having on a server with procmail. For example : editing mails, adding headers , removing text/headers etc

Re: Sieve question -- BODY contains

2002-11-26 Thread Ken Murchison
eve implementations which have a body test, and they are non-standard. > -Original Message- > From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: November 26, 2002 2:51 PM > To: Su Li > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Sieve question -- BODY contains > > Su L

RE: Sieve question -- BODY contains

2002-11-26 Thread Su Li
Thanks a lot Ken, So there is not way I can filter according to the content of the BODY. How about "exits"? Su -Original Message- From: Ken Murchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: November 26, 2002 2:51 PM To: Su Li Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Sieve questi

Re: Sieve question -- BODY contains

2002-11-26 Thread Ken Murchison
Su Li wrote: > > Hi, > > In Sieve I saw a lot of "header :contains ...". I wonder, if a user needs to do some >filtering when 'body contains "test filter"', is there some thing like "body" to >replace "header"? No. There is an I-D for a body extension, but its not implemented in cmu-sieve.

Re: Sieve Question

2001-07-20 Thread Ken Murchison
"John C. Amodeo" wrote: > > Greetings, > > This may be a stupid question, but I have seen enough mail about Sieve > Vacation in the past few days, I had a thought... > > Can you specify wildcards for the vacation addresses? Over here, we > have something like 6 different e-mail aliases that

Re: SIEVE question

2001-03-07 Thread Ken Murchison
Ralf Haferkamp wrote: > > Hi, > > Is it possible to write a SIEVE filterrule that checks all mail headers for > a specific string? Something like: > > if header :contains [*] "blahblah"{ > discard; ^ > }| > | >