All,
After much work, it was suggested by Apple Enterprise support that "Conference"
may not be a usable postuser (they had enabled the Shared Mailbox feature on
their end without much trouble, using "postuser" as the postuser).
I switched my postuser to "bb" from "Conference" and now it works li
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Josh Whitver wrote:
Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Monday, May 23, 2005 at 7:51 AM
-0600 wrote:
Yes. But you still need a postuser to inject them into the mail system
hinting that they are for delivery to shared folders.
post or bb are common choices.
Okay; I'
Derrick J Brashear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Monday, May 23, 2005 at 7:51 AM
-0600 wrote:
>Yes. But you still need a postuser to inject them into the mail system
>hinting that they are for delivery to shared folders.
>
>post or bb are common choices.
Okay; I've got one set up, and it's called "Confe
On Sat, 21 May 2005, Josh Whitver wrote:
I saw it, but wasn't sure it was applicable. I was told earlier that the
postuser ("Conference" in my case) didn't need to be an actual user on the mail
system. I'm trying to clear up that confusion now, but am not getting a clear
answer.
Does the pos
Em Sáb 21 Mai 2005 14:14, Josh Whitver escreveu:
> I saw it, but wasn't sure it was applicable. I was told earlier that the
> postuser ("Conference" in my case) didn't need to be an actual user on the
> mail system. I'm trying to clear up that confusion now, but am not getting
> a clear answer.
Andreas Hasenack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Friday, May 20, 2005 at 8:53 PM
-0600 wrote:
>> Well, "conference" isn't a user on the mail system. As I understood it,
>> when dealing with shared mailboxes, the postuser as specified in imapd.conf
>> didn't actually need to exist, and this would allow the
> Well, "conference" isn't a user on the mail system. As I understood it,
> when dealing with shared mailboxes, the postuser as specified in imapd.conf
> didn't actually need to exist, and this would allow the Shared mailboxes to
> exist outside of the user mailbox heirarchy.
>
> Do I need to have
David R Bosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Friday, May 20, 2005 at 11:42 AM -0600
wrote:
>Can you deliver to conference@ without the plus addressing?
>
>-David
Well, "conference" isn't a user on the mail system. As I understood it, when
dealing with shared mailboxes, the postuser as specified in imapd.
--On May 20, 2005 11:03:55 AM -0500 Josh Whitver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David R Bosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Friday, May 20, 2005 at 9:42 AM
-0600 wrote:
Postfix lowercases the mailbox name. Your destination must be all
lowercase for plus addressing to work, try changing it to "news" from
"N
David R Bosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Friday, May 20, 2005 at 9:42 AM -0600
wrote:
>Postfix lowercases the mailbox name. Your destination must be all
>lowercase for plus addressing to work, try changing it to "news" from
>"News". The plus above is the correct syntax.
Thanks for replying, but th
--On Friday, May 20, 2005 9:03 AM -0500 Josh Whitver
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had some tips that because I had unixheirarchysep turned on in
imapd.conf, I needed to address my mail to "Conference/News" instead of
"Conference+News" but that, unfortunately, hasn't worked either. Are
there any
Hello (yet) again,
I had some tips that because I had unixheirarchysep turned on in imapd.conf, I
needed to address my mail to "Conference/News" instead of "Conference+News" but
that, unfortunately, hasn't worked either. Are there any other tips out there
I could be following? Thanks for your ti
Hello again,
Sorry to report that I'm still having troubles getting this working.
Just to bring everyone up-to-date:
I've modified the imapd.conf file to include a "postuser: Conference" line and
added "cyrusadmin" to the list of admins.
My /etc/postfix/main.cf file has this line in it:
local_r
Em Qua 11 Mai 2005 10:25, Josh Whitver escreveu:
> say when I try to send to "Conference+News@".
> May 11 08:21:55 testldap master[9140]: about to exec
> /usr/bin/cyrus/bin/lmtpd May 11 08:21:55 testldap lmtpunix[9140]: executed
> May 11 08:21:55 testldap lmtpunix[9140]: accepted connection
> May 1
Hello again,
I posted a question on this on the postfix mailing list, and they confirmed
that at this point, my problems lie with Cyrus, not postfix. So I come back to
you good folks for help (lucky you). Here's what /var/log/mailaccess.log
(where OS X Server puts its IMAP logging) has to say wh
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Monday, May 9, 2005 at 12:50
PM -0600 wrote:
>Josh Whitver wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the help thus far, but now when I start the mail service, I get
>this
>> in /var/log/mail.log:
>>
>> May 9 11:37:59 testldap postfix/master[12863]: daemon started -- version
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 09:26 -0500, Josh Whitver wrote:
> As I understand it, this should allow us to send mail to "Conference+ mailbox name>@" and have the message delivered to the shared mailbox.
> This isn't what's happening, however. Initially, there was no mail-capable
> user named "Conferen
Josh Whitver wrote:
Thanks for the help thus far, but now when I start the mail service, I get this
in /var/log/mail.log:
May 9 11:37:59 testldap postfix/master[12863]: daemon started -- version 2.1.5
May 9 11:38:40 testldap postfix/smtpd[12887]: fatal: open database
shared_folders.db: No such fi
"Kevin P. Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Monday, May 9, 2005 at 10:25
AM -0600 wrote:
>Third, create a file in your Postfix config directory called
>'shared_folders', with contents like this:
>
>Conference yes
>
>(the second token can be anything, it just has to be present). In the
>Postfix conf
Josh Whitver wrote:
As I understand it, this should allow us to send mail to "Conference+
mailbox name>@" and have the message delivered to the shared mailbox.
This isn't what's happening, however. Initially, there was no mail-capable
user named "Conference", so I created one, but now all mail se
20 matches
Mail list logo
