On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 04:55:48PM -0400, Michael D. Sofka wrote:
> I have a new 2.3.16 back-end server and a replication server. (For
> those following my saga, I decided to upgrade the to-be-retired 2.2.12
> rsync backup server to 2.3.16. I did this so I could test replication.
> Turns out t
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:56:53AM +0100, David Carter wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Nels Lindquist wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a high-availability mail server setup with two boxes that
> > will essentially be mirrors of each other.
> >
> > If both are configured for local delivery, can I have the
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Nels Lindquist wrote:
> I'm setting up a high-availability mail server setup with two boxes that
> will essentially be mirrors of each other.
>
> If both are configured for local delivery, can I have them replicate
> each other if I utilize UUIDs?
No. IMAP is not well suited
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:40:17PM -0400, Patrick Radtke wrote:
>> when we switch we comment out the sync_server line on the replica to
>> make sure it won't listen.
>
> We have a "as master" config and an "as slave" config - and switch them
> via symlinks. Similar basic concept though - or at l
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:40:17PM -0400, Patrick Radtke wrote:
> when we switch we comment out the sync_server line on the replica to
> make sure it won't listen.
We have a "as master" config and an "as slave" config - and switch them
via symlinks. Similar basic concept though - or at least it
when we switch we comment out the sync_server line on the replica to
make sure it won't listen.
When it comes to get the master up to speed, then we reverse the roles.
We also generate a file with all our usernames in it and feed it to
sync_client on the replica and that way it will go throu
