Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Rob McMahon
Joseph Brennan wrote: It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? Might as well just double their quota. They could create a whole set o

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Joseph Brennan
--On Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14 + Rob McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? Might a

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Simon Matter
> I know this is an old problem, but I'd like your thoughts. > > We need to apply quotas to our students for the obvious reasons, but > face the old issue of having them hit their quotas and then being unable > to move forward because deleting mail from the client (SquirrelMail) > typically means m

Re: Quotas vs. Trash revisited

2005-12-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Rob McMahon wrote: > it. It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash > folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these > problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ? As long as you add a policy that Trash gets wipe