Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i

2005-01-14 Thread Connie Starr Fensky
o: "Connie Starr Fensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 6:17 PM Subject: Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i Connie Starr Fensky wrote: *I've just upgraded to imap 2.2.10 (with sasl 2.1.10) on my 11i mail server. I did this on a test box, but could not

Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i

2005-01-14 Thread Connie Starr Fensky
Monday, January 03, 2005 5:46 PM Subject: Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 14:56:38 -0600 "Connie Starr Fensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By the way, it takes almost two hours to finish ctl_cyrusdb -r, and it seems like it is hanging, because if I kill that proce

Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i

2005-01-04 Thread John Wade
Hi Connie and Amos, Since Cyrus 2.2.x allows run time configuration of db formats, I think the mboxlist format is OK, unless there is a typo I don't see in Connie's imapd.conf entry: **mboxlist_db:skiplist **a quick look at the mailboxes.db file would tell you. (or the log) I do w

Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i

2005-01-03 Thread info-cyrus -- Amos Gouaux
Connie Starr Fensky wrote: *I've just upgraded to imap 2.2.10 (with sasl 2.1.10) on my 11i mail server. I did this on a test box, but could not simulate our load (several thousand connections, ~8 messages delivered a day), and had no troubles. But, of course, putting on the mail server and s

Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i

2005-01-03 Thread Connie Starr Fensky
John Wade To: Connie Starr Fensky Cc: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 5:01 PM Subject: Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i Hi Connie, I know this falls in the obvious category and you probably already checked this, but what log level are

Re: Problems with 2.2.10 on HPUX 11i

2005-01-03 Thread John Wade
Hi Connie, I know this falls in the obvious category and you probably already checked this, but what log level are you using?  (/etc/syslog.conf)  At debug, we have found that at our moderate load (300 simultaneous users) on linux, the CPU usage of syslogd is very high. What does top or (glance