On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 10:53 PM, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:53:43PM +1000, ellie timoney wrote:
> > I don't have a 2.3.x environment handy to try to reproduce this from the
> > outside in, so I'm starting at the error code and working outwards...
> >
> > > > <1469384361
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:53:43PM +1000, ellie timoney wrote:
> I don't have a 2.3.x environment handy to try to reproduce this from the
> outside in, so I'm starting at the error code and working outwards...
>
> > > <1469384361 > > >1469384362>a0080 NO Mailbox format corruption detected
>
> "Ma
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:53:43PM +1000, ellie timoney wrote:
> I don't have a 2.3.x environment handy to try to reproduce this from the
> outside in, so I'm starting at the error code and working outwards...
>
> > > <1469384361 > > >1469384362>a0080 NO Mailbox format corruption detected
>
> "Ma
I don't have a 2.3.x environment handy to try to reproduce this from the
outside in, so I'm starting at the error code and working outwards...
> > <1469384361 > >1469384362>a0080 NO Mailbox format corruption detected
"Mailbox format corruption detected" corresponds with
IMAP_MAILBOX_CHECKSUM
Thi
Thanks for reporting this. Ellie, if you get a chance can you look at it? I'm
in the middle of the the FastMail security rollout right now, so I can't do
anything today.
Bron.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016, at 11:45, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I accidentally hijacked another thread. So here is